Vice President Kamala Harris has been trying her hardest to distance herself from the sluggish Biden-Harris management for weeks, but she admitted on Tuesday that she would not have changed in the past four decades.
While speaking on” The View”, co-host Sunny Hostin asked Harris,” If anything, would you have done something differently than President Biden during the past four years” ? ,
There is not a thing that comes to mind when I consider the majority of the choices that have had an impact, Harris said.
The tragic and fatal Afghanistan withdrawal, which left 13 U.S. support people dead, is just one of the things that should have come to mind for Harris.
As described by Politico, Harris told CNN’s Dana Bash that” she was the last man in the room”, before Biden made the fatal choice. According to the Washington Post, Harris ‘ involvement in one of Biden’s most significant and contentious shows “demonstrates how she sought to place herself as a vice chairman deeply involved in important moments.”
Harris might have said she would have changed her vote-count in 2021 and 2022 on two significant Democrat-led legislation that increased federal spending but did n’t offer much relief to those who had previously experienced historically high inflation rates.
Harris cast the tie-breaking voting in 2021 on the$ 1.9 trillion American Rescue Plan, and a year later, he did the same thing on the so-called” Prices Decline Act.” The Inflation Reduction Act, which was the largest climate change item in the government’s history, was afterwards acknowledged by Biden as having nothing to do with inflation. Eventually, economists claimed that the Inflation Reduction Act had little to nothing to accomplish with easing prices.
But Harris did n’t — and does n’t — see anything wrong with her administration’s reckless fiscal policy.
Then, of course, Harris could have also used the moment to claim that she would have handled her job as border king different.
The United States has seen record-high illegal border crossings under the Biden-Harris government, in part stemming from the president’s decision to end construction on the boundary wall and stop the” Live in Mexico” plan. Harris has just insisted that she could resolve what she broke, saying, for example, that she supports securing the frontier. But then Harris told the audience at” The View” that she would n’t have done anything different from Biden. Why then?
Because she does n’t actually believe in the policies she proclaims to support now — they’re just politically expedient, and Harris does n’t see a problem with the past four years of her administration.
Voters, however, do see a problem with the record of the administration that Harris would n’t change a thing about.
A shocking 95 % of registered voters want a member who is a shift from President Joe Biden, according to a September poll conducted by The New York Times/Siena College. The poll, conducted between Sept. 3 and Sept. 6, asked responders whether the next president should “represent a big change from Joe Biden, a small change, or no change from Joe Biden”? Sixty-three percent of respondents said the second applicant may indicate a “major shift” while 32 percent said a “minor change”.
Unfortunately, 56 % of registered voters believed Harris to represent “more of the same”; this is unfortunate for Harris. In contrast, 61 percent of voters believed that former US president Donald Trump embodied some form of shift. In addition, Harris was preferred by registered voters to deal with the business and immigration, two important battle problems.
But Harris is completely dependent on the advertising hit, and it’s working overtime to break the relationships between Harris and her own management, even though Harris herself is stifling those efforts. For instance, Aaron Blake, a senior political reporter for The Washington Post, claimed that Democrats are” trying hard to connect Harris more strongly to Biden on the market, immigration, and the border,” suggesting that this energy apparently misinterpreted reality.
Harris herself only recently acknowledged that she herself supports every decision Biden has made over the past four decades.
Harris ‘ Tuesday admission would signal the end of her plan if the country had a functioning media. However, Harris ‘ full-throated support of the past four years and her role in the nation’s damage will continue to be covered up by the media, even when Harris disagrees.
Brianna Lyman is a journalist for The Federalist on primaries. With a diploma in global political economy, Brianna received her diploma from Fordham University. Her job has been featured on Newsmax, Fox News, Fox Business and RealClearPolitics. Following Brianna on X: @briannalyman2