According to a fresh Royal Family book, Queen Elizabeth II reportedly became upset when Harry and Meghan’s daughter, Lilibet, was given to her as Elizabeth’s birth name because she struggled to speak Elizabeth. It eventually became one of the endearing names that the late Prince Philip gave his wife.
Meghan Markle told that she was granted permission to use the name ‘Lilibet’ for their daughter.Harry too maintained that version but it enraged the Queen. Lilibet was born in June 2021, two years after Harry and Meghan left their royal duties and exited the family to settle in the US.
Robert Hardman’s guide’ Charles III: New King, New Court. According to The In History, one part of the team claimed that after hearing Harry and Meghan’s remarks, the late Queen was” as furious as I’d actually seen her” and that she was” as angry as I’d ever seen her.”
According to a BBC report, the Queen was not asked for her permission to use the name Lilibet for Harry and Meghan’s girl, but some reports claimed that when Harry and Meghan called her, she was unable to say no.
The old story came back as Meghan Markle was under the radar for her growing aversion to Prince Harry, and there are numerous rumors that the royal couple might decide to split up. Meghan is also receiving negative press on a professional front after her former employees claimed she is a dictator in high heels. Meghan is more focused on her own charity work than Harry’s. While work is separating them, according to insiders, they are already on a ‘ trial separation’.
A representative of Harry and Meghan said they would not have used Lilibet’s name without the late monarch’s consent when the dispute over Lilibet’s name broke out. The Duke called his family in advance of the announcement, noting that his grandmother was the first family member he called. During that conversation, he shared their hope of naming their daughter Lilibet in her honour. Had she not been supportive, they would not have used the name”, it was said.
The claims that the pair had not asked the Queen for permission were defamatory and incorrect, according to the law firm Schillings, who represents Harry and Meghan.
Trending
- 672,000 absentee ballots cast in Michigan three weeks out from Election Day
- How Conservative Judges Shape Our Laws
- Is It Time to Invest in Plywood?
- Harris Is Slipping — But Why?
- ‘Turns out Trump was right’: FBI ‘quietly’ updates crime data, reveals increase
- 150 Border Patrol cameras are broken, making illegal immigration easier: Report
- SCOTUS Has Higher Approval Rating Than Before Dobbs Decision While Trust In Media Plummets
- Did Meghan Markle lie about daughter Lilibet’s name? Prince Harry too…