What started out as a protest against Covid photo demands has since grown into a full-fledged movement to reclaim health and medical freedom for all Americans.  , In quick,” Create America Healthy Again”.
Voters on both sides of the political spectrum have found common ground in opposing all from mandatory childhood vaccination schedule to food additives. However “MAHA” seems to take participants from the normal remedy-seeking, tree-hugging,” flavorful cereal moms” emergency normally associated with the left as well as the “do n’t step on me” types generally identified as right-leaning.  ,
Because food and drug health is not merely a kept- or right-angle problem. Poor health and addiction, whether it be to food or drugs, do n’t care what kind of political garb one wears.  , Yet leave it to Democrat corporate media to tag health unity as “fringe” and” Republican” . ,
Media Backlash to MAHA
Just read the beginning of a recent article in the New York Times by Sheryl Gay Stolberg:” Weight to public health, relegated to the fringes of the American right and left, before Covid vaccine mandates became a social flashpoint and symbol of government overreach, today has a strong foothold in Democratic politics and a chance to possess true power in Washington.”
Individuals speaking up against what many want to visit America’s” ill treatment system” — referring to the endless cycle of poor diet, condition, and medicine — are not on the border. A sizable portion of regular Americans are impacted by an elite group of governmental “experts” who prophesy a distinct narrative with no room for debate, unlike other subjects that have been barred from open and honest conversations by Big Tech and crooked media.  ,
But like transsexuals, funding for international war, and immigration, the only group giving this big party of anxious people a platform to air their issues seems to be the new, more populist-oriented Republican Party.
In September, Sen. Ron Johnson, R-Wis., hosted a roundtable discussion entitled” American Health and Nutrition: A Second Opinion” in which top medical experts and health influencers, such as Dr. Marty Makary and Jillian Michaels, testified on the state of our nation’s well-being. ( Hint: It’s not good. )  ,
Left-captured media outlets had a strong and swift response. The day after the roundtable discussion, columnist Elaine Godfrey of The Atlantic titled the event a” Woo Woo Caucus” with the words “health and nutrition” in quotes, as if they are figments of the imagination.  ,
A board-certified oncology and gastrointestinal , laparoscopic surgical doctor from Johns Hopkins does n’t really strike me as woo-woo. Neither does wanting to know more about the ingredients in our food or medicine supply.
Godfrey’s article was reminiscent of the propaganda press’s Covid reporting, which vilified curious people who wanted to know more about the shots before injecting their bodies with foreign substances, commenting that the roundtable “had a very do-your-own-research vibe” . ,
Ironically, leftists and the Democrat Party used to support those who advocated “doing research” into alternative health options and woo-woo healing techniques like herbal remedies, acupuncture, and using food and nutrition as medicine. After all, most of these health concepts flourished in the bluest state, which is responsible for everything woo-woo: California. Many of the people who made comments to Johnson’s panel either reside in California or spent the majority of their careers there.  ,
Along the way, California and the left lost their way. It now embraces bureaucratic alliances with powerful private organizations, which were once the norm. The health movement is a clear example of the growing number of people who oppose the authoritarian media and corporate control of executive branch organizations.
Although Donald Trump and Robert K. K. Jr. are the current faces of this new Republican coalition, newly established health PACs ensure that the momentum they have generated will continue well into the new year.  ,
Carrying the Torch
The unified MAGA-MAHA force has sprung up in at least two PACs, bringing it together. The MAHA Alliance, a recently announced PAC, is specific about its goal of ensuring Donald Trump’s victory in November, which would in turn give RFK Jr., who has a larger share of the independent vote, a prominent place at the table.  ,
The other PAC simply declares itself to be Make America Healthy Again and wants to “dismantle the corporate stranglehold on our government agencies that has resulted in widespread chronic disease, environmental degradation, and widespread public distrust.”
Former Robert F. Kennedy Jr. campaign staffer and current MAHA PAC advocacy and outreach director Jeff Hutt,” The idea of what political party you were before never crossed our minds.” This was the populist political spectrum’s menagerie. People who might have been divided into teams red and blue were once again reunited on team America, which was fantastic.
Hutt’s remarks back up the notion that the upcoming election will be held less squarely against Republicans and more squarely against Democrats. The conflict is between those who want to keep control of a nation that is ruled by a bureaucracy of biased “experts” and those who oppose them for their own political and financial gain. This includes the Food and Drug Administration, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and the Department of Agriculture, some of the biggest organizations that regulate health and nutrition in the nation.
Public health experts worry that public health powers will be curtailed if Mr. Trump wins in November because of the idea of a political movement that rejects expertise and prioritizes personal choice in an epidemic, wrote Stolberg in The New York Times.
But the new health movement does n’t reject expertise. It rejects one-sided health opinion and the demonization of well-credentialed experts who do n’t adhere to the Democrat regime’s official narrative. These include experts such as Dr. Casey Means, a Stanford-trained head and neck surgeon, Dr. Peter McCullough, one of the most prolific public health experts with more than 1, 000 published peer-reviewed papers and 660 citations in the National Library of Medicine, and Dr. Robert Redfield, former head of the CDC.
The New York Times is correct in one thing: This fresh, concerted effort to reform how Americans view health has a strong foothold in Republican politics and a chance to wield real power in Washington. And the nation will benefit from it more.  ,