Left-wing media outlets made a predetermined decision regarding the Bret Baier discussion with Kamala Harris on Fox News. ” Embarrassing”, claims the Daily Beast of Baier’s performance. ” Partisanship comes through very slyly”, writes the Hollywood Reporter.  ,
Advertisement
However for these and most other left-wing observers, there’s a record available. Instead of concentrating on Harris’s comments, HotAir’s Ed Morrissey decided to analyze every single topic Baier asked Harris during the 25-minute meeting.
According to Ed,” Let’s evaluate these for chemical and justice on a firm empirical basis more than flip and desperation,” Morrissey received a transcript of the interview on FNC’s” Special Report with Bret Baier.”
The entire set of discussion questions that Ed put up are available below.
In contrast to the “tense” meeting with Harris that Baier conducted this year, the departed is making a big deal of the ball questions Trump was asked next month.  ,
After the interview aired in June 2023, Erik Wemple of the Washington Post wrote,” In crucial moments, Baier’s hiring put Trump on his feet, forcing him to come up with sloppy apologies for his conduct.”
Scarcely a political lapdog, next. At the time, left-wing press praised Baier for being hard on Trump.
” Baier frequently pushed up on Trump’s falsehoods and exposed his threats on key conservative interests”, Axios reported afterwards.
At days, Baier sounded exasperated, as when Trump claimed he won the 2020 election. ” You lost the 2020 poll”, Baier said, in a voice that suggested he was tired of the rest. ” There were recounts in all the swing state”, the outlet added.
At various points, Baier cracked quips and agreed with Trump, betraying a familiarity with the former president. Baier and Harris, on the other hand, had not met before Wednesday. ” It’s good to meet you”, Harris said at the finish of the meeting.
When questioned about Harris, Baier seemed more interested because he was aware that the conservative audience wanted to see her writhe in her seat.
Nevertheless, Baier interrupted Harris at least 38 days in 27 days, about twice as often as Baier interjected with Trump ( at least 28 days in 36 hours ).
Advertisement
Could it be that Harris refused to respond while Trump was n’t ducking questions? Is that why Baier stopped Harris and attempted to persuade her to respond directly to a topic she glably understood?
At the Chicago Economic Club this month, Brett Baier spoke with the former president in a manner comparable to Bloomberg News Editor-in-Chief John Micklethwait’s.
Ed Morrissey’s excellent work finding the issues in the questions asked challenges Baier’s criticism of the media’s state of unfairness.
An president in the White House for the past three years and those who oppose Baier should look at this checklist and ask the questions that are inappropriate. Every question in this article has to do with either Harris ‘ publicly stated jobs over the past five decades, the Biden-Harris White House’s policies and efficiency, or what she would do if elected leader. There is n’t a personal-scandal or gotcha issue in this, every single query– and that includes the issue of Biden’s cognitive reduction, which is the reason Harris is the nominee– is substantial and honest.
Those who claim Baier fabricated information and used it to pounce on a sitting VP and major-party national candidate must provide evidence that any of these inquiries are cruel, let alone that a sizable portion of them. The environment of Harris ‘ initial plan, which was purportedly to engage the Fox News viewers by discussing issues that matter to them, must be included in that description.  ,
Baier’s critics are n’t operating out of principle by casting him as a hack. They are reacting out of desperation because they have seen Harris ‘ inability to respond to even the most basic inquiries about her beliefs or arguments for supporting her.  ,
Advertisement
The left’s main gripe with Baier is that they did n’t like how the left-wing media handled Trump, as they did with Harris. They think that the kind, modest questioning of” The View” women ought to have been the literary standard when asking Harris.