A few months into Kamala Harris’s 2024 political work, her operators faced a problem. If they continue to cover up the applicant or let her go into the general public? Both choices came with significant political uncertainties.
Advertisement
Sure, Democrats had stay pretending Harris was a millennial skills, but her refusal to stay down for an appointment, much less give a press conference, was eroding this story.
On the other hand, as her operators absolutely understood, the more persons hear from Harris, the more involved they tend to find.
However, Harris is a nuclear saying dispenser. Some people in American history have uttered so many thoughts in such a short amount of language.
Her use of cartoonishly ridiculous phrases should be used in school textbooks to clarify what a “tautology” is to kids because they are frequently so absurd.
It is clearer than ever that extemporaneous speaking is n’t Harris ‘ strong suit after watching Fox News ‘ Bret Baier interview him. The presidential candidate has an amazing ability to respond to simple inquiries in mind-bending, tortuous combinations of meaningless nonsequities.
In order to avoid this issue, Harris ‘ “media blitz” was initially planned to make sure the candidate would n’t ever find herself in the vicinity of a difficult inquiry. Prior to joining Fox, she made sycophants such as sexual blogger Alexandra Cooper and former horror jock Howard Stern. She spoke with” The View” cheerleaders and allies on MSNBC.
Advertisement
Harris struggled to provide a compelling response to any inquiries even in these pleasant settings.
Non-journalist market members suddenly pressed her on inflation during an unplanned Univision town hall. Harris letting everyone understand she was not just of middle-class inventory but working-class investment. Which is to say, nobody in the market actually heard something fresh.
And perhaps they were the ones who were fortunate.
During a pre-recorded meeting with “60 Minutes”, editor Bill Whitaker threw a bunch of fair, if predictable, issues at Harris. No caveats, no serious dives into policy. However, Harris unleashed like a torrent of nonsense that CBS News had to go up and plug in an response when the Israel-Palestinian situation came upward– it’s been in the news, I’m certain you’ve heard.
A political candidate who is capable of articulating a coherent foreign policy worldview would undoubtedly find themselves in the face of intense scrutiny in a more democratic world. These days, though, political editors actually rearrange the Democrat president’s words to make her sound standard. I can tell you that former US president Donald Trump, who frequently has syntax issues, not received such favorable care.
Advertisement
Therefore, the critical issue is: Why does Harris usually appear to be a ninth-grader during an oral exam while concealing time?
No one can communicate well on a subject purely on codes and talking details. She does n’t know what she thinks. She does n’t know what you want her to say. She is unable to draw any kind of information from.
According to her flowing nonanswers, it is very possible that Harris has never seriously considered any of these problems. However, Harris ‘ most wonderful phrase on international policy reads as thus: “Ukraine is a country in Europe. It is located close to another nation, Russia. Russia is a bigger land”.
I’ve yet to come across it if she offers anything other than a monotony on the market or faith or management or tradition or constitutional law or anything else. This person has been living under the impression that the proverb that “what you be, unburdened by what has been” made her sound like the second Martin Luther King Jr.
I’ve also heard that Harris is most likely stifled by idiot disorder, a sludgy self-consciousness about how much she knows and how to treat people around her.
What if her stress is not caused by a sense of inadequacy but rather by itself? Consider the continuous giggling. This reflex is perhaps symptomatic of a well-earned lack of confidence. Her odd grammar frequently reveals an imposter trying to persuade you that she is a wise person.
Advertisement
Certainly, most politicians pinpoint, flip-flop and “evolve” on plan. It’s doubtful, however, that any significant politician in history has dropped as many posts as substantially and as quickly as Harris. There is a slim chance that she will be able to explain morality or social beliefs.
Unless, of course, by a belief structure, we’re talking about “empowering Kamala”.
The Bret Baier crisis was the chorus, but it was nothing new. If you pay attention to Harris ‘ words, you are faced with a pointless political design that is way beyond her power. Though, alas, if history is any manual, she has all the skills we expect of a leader.