Tony Romo’s sports predictions have always seemed a little hokey, so I’m starting to feel a little hypocritical. But at this stage, I’m turning into a democratic Merlin. ( I ostensibly promise to use my abilities for good and not evil. ) How’s the latest:
Advertisement
My examination of the effective end of the presidential contest was published by PJ Media on October 17. The article contained two gun points:
Kamala Harris ( and other leading Democrats ) will begin making direct accusations against the American people for supporting them. It wo n’t just be racism/sexism anymore, but something deeper than that.
- You’ll notice an overall deluge of advertising stories about Democratic/liberal buyers ‘ grief. There will be op-eds and criticisms everywhere on internet sources, from the ultra-mainstream ( all the usual suspects, from MSNBC through The New York Times ) to the leftists of the left, who will blast the Democrats for “forcing” Kamala Harris on them.
As I noted, the first one started to come true over the weekend, culminating with today’s announcement pattern. I wrote on Oct. 21:
The first of these two evidence is then happening. The “freaking lot” could lead to a landslide victory for Trump, according to a bit from The Hill today. Trump’s “wild and vulgar rhetoric reaches a new serious,” was the headline to come in a few hours later. Why black men in Martin Luther King’s hometown wo n’t vote for Kamala Harris, the Telegraph questioned.
These kinds of” Blame Americans First”! Over the weekend, new tales started to appear. According to The Nation, “JD Vance Shows That Racist Conspiracy Theories Are the GOP’s Forthcoming.” Trump reaffirms that he is extending his support for Latino voters by doubling down on discriminatory rests, according to The New Republic. The Washington Post went farther:” Seeking a historic gain, Harris faces a common foe: Sexism”.
( For the uninitiated, the “scared majority” is the liberal media’s latest euphemism for “working class white people who do n’t support Democrats”. )
Advertisement
But what about the following following a? That a came real 24 hours , after and is picking up steam now.
What if Joe Biden had been the better choice from the beginning, according to a report from The Hill? Here’s another:” Miss Kamala Harris: Should Democrats Have Picked Michelle Obama”? More:” Even Republican Electors Show Signs Of’ Purchasers Remorse ‘ Over Party’s Extraordinary Electoral Techniques: I&, I/TIPP Poll”.
The final content is unquestionably worthwhile to read. According to polling data, 58 % of Democrats concurred that the Democratic Party’s selection process did not produce the strongest candidate. ]emphasis added]
Remember, this is n’t the polling data of conservatives, PJ Media readers, or undecided voters — these are Kamala’s fellow Democrats!
Also, 54 % of Democrats agreed with the speech that ,” I lost considerable belief in the Democratic Party because it did not disclose Biden’s health problems during the principal process”. ]emphasis added]
Bottom collection?
If you think it’s getting negative for Harris then, just you delay! Progressives have never reached their lowest point. All these initial articles may appear to be garbage when the Democrats decide that all trust is lost and a second Trump administration is unavoidable. I firmly believe that the liberal media will unleash a revenge and indignation on Harris and the Democratic Party’s authority. You ai n’t seen nothin’ yet.
Advertisement
The WORST is yet to occur.