Proposition 36, a ballot initiative in California that would make some drug and financial theft offenses, is out with a majority of voters and is expected to pass favorably on November 5.
Advertisement
According to a poll conducted by the Public Policy Institute of California, 73 % of voters support the program while only 25 % oppose it. Additionally, the legislation would make it simpler to deport some illegal immigrants who are in the position.
” It is not understatement to say that if Prop. 36 runs, more Californians, including green-card buyers, including migrants, may be deported”, said Grisel Ruiz, a supervising counsel with the Immigrant Legal Resource Center. ” The impacts will be pretty disastrous” . ,
However, the ballot initiative’s intention to deport illegal aliens with previous convictions is an unintended consequence of the new rules.
A basic drug possession cost with previous convictions may be categorized as an “aggravated felony” conviction in immigration court under this new system, which means the most significant penalties possible. A person who has an “aggravated criminal” on their report faces mandatory imprisonment for life and loses all chances of receiving immigration relief, according to Ruiz.  ,
According to Reisig,” the immigration debate is just a red salmon because DAs now have a proven track record of working to reduce ridiculous immigration effects.”  ,
Yolo County District Attorney Jeff Reisig, a Prop. 36 backers claimed the legislation does not significantly increase the risks for immigrants compared to the recent legislation that the governor signed and the legislation that the government lately passed.  ,
Advertisement
A minor drug charge wo n’t be brought to the attention of the prosecution. They may turn it down to a criminal and deliver the illegal. That’s the current state of the system, and Prop 36’s section is unlikely to cause it to change.
The opposition is attempting to muddy the waters by asserting that immigration courts are more harsh than position judges.
” Even if the legal determine exercises some lenience or exercises some judgment, that choice is not carried into the emigration deliberations”, she said. That is all well and great for a legal court. However, the immigration authorities do not acknowledge a wide range of remedial and relief-based issues, including dismissal in state court.
The law will impose more severe sanctions on repeat offenders. It’s difficult to argue that most voters do n’t understand why allowing offenders to skate simply because their crimes do n’t pass a certain arbitrary threshold.
Followers of Prop. 36 claim that Proposition 47, a previous vote initiative, has some flaws, and that the measure did address them. Approved by citizens ten years ago, Prop. By reclassifying six felony theft and drug offenses, including shoplifting and basic drug possession, as misdemeanors, 47 sought to reduce California’s serious prison overcrowding. The resulting cost savings were used to fund medicine and mental health care and solutions for crime victims and students at risk. Since then, membership fell sharply in California’s recommended drug judges, which offer therapy as an alternative to a faith. However, lawyers, officers, and big box merchants like Walmart and Target blamed the rules for an increase in home crimes and poverty.  ,
Advertisement
” The country’s nonpartisan Congressional Analyst’s Office predicts the program would raise California’s jail population of 90, 000 residents by a dozen thousand”, according to CalMatters.  ,
The goal of the changes in laws is to take drug offenders into rehabilitation services, no prison. Rehabbing from an addiction does not have a successful track record for getting people off of medicines. However, simultaneously cracking down on open-air drug markets might aid some addicts and stop some murder.