Even as The Post’s management attempts to defend its decision, critics and defections have been a result of The Washington Post’s decision to not support any candidate for president in the 2024 vote.
According to The New York Post, the billionaire owner Jeff Bezos officially called off the Post’s 36-year custom of supporting political candidates.
Staff members of the newspaper website apparently had drafted a draft of an endorsement for Kamala Harris over former US President Donald Trump.
The Post appears to have sexy feelings following the choice. Former editorial board member Robert Kagan, a voice Trump critic, resigned in protest. Former director Marty Baron condemned the walk as” timidity, with politics as its casualty”, arguing it undermines The Post’s role in holding social leaders accountable.
Reviewers, including some team, have questioned Bezos’s intentions, noting his large business interests. They speculate his judgement may stem from Trump’s earlier accusations of Bezos and Amazon, given the bank’s reliance on government deals.
Publisher May Lewis made the announcement that The Washington Post may be “returning to its stems” by refraining from mentioning testimonials in the upcoming and upcoming elections. In a statement to visitors, Lewis acknowledged that some may see this as” a tacit support or criticism” of one applicant over another. He claimed, however, that the selection shows a commitment to “integrity and courage in pubic service.”
Bezos, worth an estimated$ 209 billion, has n’t commented publicly, fueling further speculation. Karen Attiah, a former Washington Post writer, expressed disappointment by calling the choice” a stab in the up to all of us who value democracy.”
Many subscribers canceled their accounts and accused Bezos of placing his business interests before people service. Some readers saw it as a betrayal of The Post’s visitors, who’ve longer relied on the report for advice on political testimonials.
This pattern is n’t exclusive to The Post, as The Los Angeles Times even just announced a similar plan, apparently directed by user Patrick Soon-Shiong.
The scheme has caused resignations and raised concerns about the growing impact of rich media owners on editor decisions. These choices, according to critics, reflect a disturbing change in how news organizations interact with political processes, particularly in times of conflict.
Trending
- US elections 2024: Beyoncé lights up Houston rally in support of Kamala Harris
- Washington Post’s decision to not endorse US presidential candidate sparks uproar
- Musk defends $1 million daily giveaway following warning over violation of federal election law
- Donald Trump vs Kamala Harris: 6 interesting facts about US Elections 2024
- Nasa astronaut recently back from space station hospitalised, condition stable
- Big Pharma Markets Weight Loss Drugs as Unemployment Cure, Demands Government Subsidy
- Audio: Trump assassination attempt 911 calls released
- Delta Air Line sues CrowdStrike over ‘catastrophic’ software update that prompted mass flight cancellations