For most fair Americans, reality and lie are very easy to identify. But to our nation’s advertising press, the words are totally subjective.
Case in point: the public’s unhinged reaction to Donald Trump’s Thursday analysis of Liz Cheney’s fascination with military invasion. The former leader criticized Cheney for her international policy and the danger it poses to the United States and its service people while speaking with Tucker Carlson in Arizona.
” ]Liz Cheney ] always wanted to go to war with people. I did n’t want to go to war. She wanted to stay in Syria, I took them out. She wanted to stay in Iraq, I took them out. I mean, if it were up to her, we’d been in 50 different nations”, Trump said. ” ]N] ochre one, it’s really dangerous, number two, a lot of people get killed, and number three …, it’s very, very expensive. That’s why we owe$ 36 trillion”.
Later in the discussion, Trump followed up with feedback that have since been seized by commercial advertising: “]Cheney is ] a radical war bird. This place her with a shotgun, standing it with nine containers shooting at her, okay? When the weapons are trained on her face, let’s see how she feels about it. You know, they’re all conflict hawks when they’re sitting in Washington in a great building saying,’ Gee, come give 10, 000 troops straight into the mouth of the enemy,'” he said.
It does n’t take a rocket scientist to understand Trump’s commentary. He made it clear that warmongers like Cheney are all for risking the lives of American service members when they are not the ones who are on the front lines.
However, anything Trump says is immediately open for interpretation and openly distortion, as is often the case with our morally bankrupt media. In this instance, the advertising media has manipulated Trump’s analysis into something that is far removed from its true purpose.
Within a matter of hours, a media-wide pseudo-scandal was entirely fabricated out of thin air.
Our so-called “democracy” supporters allegedly threatened Trump with violence against Cheney, despite numerous hack-tastic headlines and lies-filled hot takes.
The event serves as a perfect case study on how the media operates as a public relations firm working for the Democrat Party and, by definition, our leftist-run national authorities, even though the intention to harm Trump’s political prospects heading into Election Day is quite clear.
The business press soon tidies up and removes the facts from context whenever a situation like this occurs, in which Trump or another Republican presents analysis or facts that the left finds offensive.
The press are essentially deceiving Americans into believing Trump wants her affected by denying them any of the previous congresswoman’s harmful foreign policy agenda in the case of Trump’s Cheney criticism. However, the first step in this advertising scheme is to manipulate the public. By generating a minimal discussion, the push provides fodder for so-called” reporters” and democratic allies to further the lay.
Kamala Harris spoke to the media on Friday about her role in this sport. The latest Vice President and Democratic nominee rehashed the media’s false accusations of Trump’s comment and accused the former chairman of using “violent rhetoric.”
In their most ominous form, however, the public’s pseudo-events are weaponized to kill not only non-leftist’s careers but likewise their lives. Not even 24 hours after Trump issued his remarks, Arizona Attorney General Kris Mayes, a Democrat, announced in a speech that she asked her” legal division commander to begin looking at” and “analyzing” the Democratic presidential nominee’s remark to identify “whether it qualifies as a suicide threat under Arizona’s rules”.
Does this strategy sound familiar? It should. It’s the same playbook that used the fabricated Russia collusion to support Trump’s 2016 campaign; it’s also the same ploy employed by Democrats to launch invasive investigations into Justice Brett Kavanaugh’s life. In both cases, the government-led inquiries were based entirely on lies that have since been refuted, but the Democrat Party was still benefited by the press ‘ perpetuation and propagation of lies.
A society cannot survive a press that is so authoritarian. A truthful media is required by civil society to provide truthful and fair information to the public regarding its government.
Unfortunately, that is not the main concern of America’s corporate press. Our contemporary media is much more focused on advancing the Democrat agenda. Their distaste for the Marxist cause is just as harmful to our country as the politicized law practiced by them.
The Federalist staff writer Shawn Fleetwood graduated from the University of Mary Washington. He previously served as a state content writer for Convention of States Action and his work has been featured in numerous outlets, including RealClearPolitics, RealClear Health, and Conservative Review. Follow him on Twitter @ShawnFleetwood
