It’s an amazing technique when a group of citizens defy Godly laws, animal nature, civility, and common sense with one shift. Such is the situation of California’s Proposition 3, a constitutional change redefining wedding to include anything. No actually.  ,
Advertisement
You can imagine that immediately throuuples, individuals who want to marry children, and people who want to marry their life-sized cheap blow-up figurine will do just that, despite the fact that it may seem like a bend at the time.  ,
These self-same electors overwhelmingly passed Initiative 3 on a time when Californians exhibited a shiver of sobriety long enough to support another effort to make crime improper once more. When I checked the ballot at 1: 30 Wednesday morning, the democratic amendment , was passing , by quiet of a two-to-one margin, with 78 % of the vote counted. Great pain.  ,
This is based on the California Family Council’s extremely calm legitimate research, which has been warning about this exact outcome for months. Berkeley and Oakland have both passed legislation that permit unions of “polyamorous” throuples.  ,
Leather-chaps-wearing, anything-goes San Francisco State Senator Scott Wiener drew up with another queer advocate what may have sounded to the neck like a fair enough legal article. What could , possibly , go bad with an article that asserted a” legal right to relationship”? Anything could go bad, that’s what.
Advertisement
Connected:  , West Coast, Messed Coastâ„¢: Only a’ Throuple’ of Items About Our Election Ejection Edition
But like all wet lawmakers, there was more around than voters likely knew. I explained it in a recent election model of the West Coast, Messed Coast â„¢ report:  ,
In fact, the California Family Council and other legal organizations contend that by replacing the state constitution’s general definition of “marrying is a basic right,” it would cease to be limited to primary cousins, underage individuals, couples, and how many people could be a couple, or if they have to be individual.
San Francisco Sen. Scott Wiener, the fringe queer blade from the Castro District, says , Travel now, did I ever again a constitutional amendment to remove standard marriage? Lil ‘ good’ me?
The California Family Council confirms this assertion, threatens to fundamentally change the definition of marriage in California, repeals Proposition 8, and repeals the provisions that support relationship as a union entirely between one man and one woman. ” Oh, is that all? They state that marriage is a “fundamental process” and the foundation of our society, but oops, the voters forgot about the values of civilization.
Advertisement
The group says”, Its removal may include far-reaching and dangerous consequences,” such as no defining what creature a person may marriage. However, a relationship lover need not be human. How do we recognize this? Nothing else in the law stipulates what constitutes a union other than that it has a “fundamental right” to it.  ,
Californian citizens were tricked by the sincere-sounding politicians who claimed that passing this monster was about “equity.” ” Citizens are soldiers! They are but brave and valiant!  ,
Sooner or later — perhaps sooner – lady wives, child brides, and pedophilia may be considered normal. Or more you’re a narcissist, normal people.
Voters may return in a generation or but fighting for the safety of their children after they realize the terrible they set completely on November 5, 2024, like Proposition 47, which Kamala and firm promised would be much more fair to criminals.  ,
