These are generally days of mourning ( mixed with a generous helping of hysterical fearmongering ) for the left, but the Hamas-linked Council on American-Islamic Relations ( CAIR ) is all smiles. The Massachusetts Commission Against Discrimination (MCAD ) has determined “probable cause” in a discrimination case involving a Muslim woman who claims a McDonald’s employee intentionally and maliciously served her pork, according to the Massachusetts chapter of the Council on American-Islamic Relations ( CAIR-MA ). No, it was n’t Donald Trump, but the victim and her CAIR allies are furious, and looking for justice, otherwise known as a big payday.
Advertisement
It all started way back in June 2021, when, according to the Associated Press, when a hijab-wearing Muslim person, Ghadir Alahmar, walked into a McDonald’s with her twofold seven-year-old children. Ayahmar “ordered a plain fish sandwich,” and thoughtfully “here one of her children repeat the order to a worker in case they could n’t understand her accent.”
McDonald’s employees, according to Alahmar, in their hate and” Islamophobia”, decided to load up the fish sandwich with ( shield your children’s eyes ) bacon. The innocent victims “received their attempt, which included fry and cookies,” and then proceeded to a local school park where they planned to have. One of her brothers took notice of the ham. According to the problem, the sandwich appeared to have additional bacon as well, according to the complaint. According to the problem, one brother ate the lower half of the baguette and a portion of the fish filet, but they did not consume the bacon. the bass filet’s lower portion and the bun’s lower portion? Ohhh-kay. Regardless, the home was, they claim, completely traumatized.
The recklessly potential Trump company, according to an angry Alahmar, purposefully made my children and I feel unwelcome and stupid by purposefully stuffing a tuna sandwich with ham, without any other purpose other than to punish us for our faith and religious convictions. This has really caused us harm. My kids are then unsure of whether they are pleasant in their own nation. They ask me,’ Do they love us?’ How should a family respond to that query?
Advertisement
Why would the young people ask Alahmar that? Why do n’t they ask her,” Did they get our order wrong”? Why is it that they may become victims of a hate crime in default style? Perhaps because Hamas-linked CAIR is involved, and CAIR would have you believe that the McDonald’s employees involved knew perfectly also what they were doing, and did it out of plain hate. In response, CAIR has “filed a prejudice problem with the Massachusetts Commission Against Discrimination on the person’s behalf.”
The issue states that” Islam forbids Muslims from eating meat.” McDonald’s employees deliberately added pork to the plaintiff’s food in an effort to insult, humiliate, and cause stress to accused and her young children”. Willfully? Is McDonald’s really in the company of trying to humiliate and ridicule its customers? MCAD thinks so, as it has now ruled that” a fact-finder may reasonably conclude” that giving Alahmar bacon was” not in error”. So it must have been the work of a diabolical” Islamophobe”.
McDonald’s in its own security defended the payment, arguing that this occurred during the COVID madness and that occasionally the hearing was difficult due to a plexiglass barrier between the staff members and customers. Could the Alahmars have claimed that they did n’t want any pork and that the employee simply did n’t follow the order and assumed they were asking for pork? Do arbitrary” Islamophobes” find work at McDonald’s simply so they can wait for a second to spring meat upon poor, unsuspecting Muslims? On the surface, this seems implausible. Nor did the insulting employee or anyone else make any” Antisemitic” notes. And when Alahmar complained, the boss apologized and refunded their income.
Advertisement
McDonald’s “vehemently denies that any of their people consciously added bacon” to Alahmar’s get” to distinguish against her”. However, MCAD found “probable trigger”, so McDonald’s better be ready with its cash.
Related:  , Of Course: Deranged Harris Supporters Harass and Threaten the McDonald’s That Managed Trump
Unknowingly, CAIR attorney Barbara Dougin stated that “religious prejudice at a place of public lodging is not only illegal, but also socially repugnant,” and that” the problem is the first step in the process of seeking financial damages.” Ah yes. There it is. Moreover, according to AP,” she even hopes it prompts McDonald’s to better educate its employees to avoid a similar event in the future”. Who will administer that awareness training? Why, CAIR, of training. And they do n’t work for free.
So what we have here appears to be yet another mattress effort. McDonald’s is a large company with lots of income. It does n’t want a lot of negative publicity from CAIR’s Ibrahim Hooper and his sinister crew calling it” Islamophobic”. Therefore, it is likely to side over a large number of Benjys to CAIR and Ghadir Alahmar to create this disappear. Works like a charm.