They Did Nazi It Coming: How Comparing Trump to Hitler Cost Kamala the Election

Of all the Harris-Walz player’s boneheaded, braindead choices, riding with the Fuhrer until the bitter conclusion was nummer consistency. Trump is Hitler was their main PR information throughout the whole political promotion, and they made every effort to bind the Right to the Reich. They were continuous and uncompromising.

It was also News malfeasance.

Look, if you seriously, really believe a member is Adolf Hitler, you’re not going to voting for him. Of all the constituencies Harris-Walz did n’t have to fight tooth and nail for, it was the” Trump is Hitler” true believers! They were going to vote for Kamala Harris in any case regardless of what she said or did.

Why? You guessed it: Because” Trump is Hitler”.

It’s PR fraud to expend resources on captured previews, especially when you’re trailing hard somewhere!

For crying out quiet, it’s 2024. Trump has “literally been Hitler” since 2016. We’ve all heard it ad nauseum. For the life of me, I do n’t understand why the Democrats assumed that voters who had been persuaded for the first 50 gazillion times would change after the first 50 gazillion and one.

They would have been better off igniting their currency with a spark. They squandered a lot of time and effort.

But it also cost them anything more — and in doing so, it ( at least partially ) value the Democrats the whole vote.

Let me describe via instance: When you hire a PR firm, you often get a PR congressman who’ll control your company’s “account”. When he begins working, the PR pro wo n’t be using your company’s email. He’ll get using his PR company’s email. &nbsp,

Which sucks for your company: If the PR professional is the public’s even point-of-contact, when he leaves, therefore does your internet access. But if he used a generic business email like]email&nbsp, protected], the company had at least be able to save meetings and continue the dialogue.

Marketing companies insist on this design. And it’s also so you ca n’t see the mistakes that bad PR firms make, not just for the obvious benefit of giving us leverage over our clients and encouraging them to renew our contracts.

PR firms disseminate media produces. Some companies take pride in creating flawless, personalized internet lists and treating each journalist to VIP treatment on them. ( I do. ) A personal touch makes a big difference.

But that takes time. A whole lot of day.

So many ( bad ) agencies will cut corners by creating ridiculously large media lists and blasting it to everyone. With PR program, you may mass-blast a media release to thousands of editors lickety-split. takes no effort at all! Sure, you’ll be emailing large numbers of people who are completely, 100 % uninterested in your topic, but you do n’t tell your client that.

Instead, you just show them the “hits”: The two or three journalists who wrote up.

From the lawyer’s vantagepoint, their company must’ve done a wonderful work: Look at all the tremendous media coverage they got me!

That’s because you do n’t see any of the negativity: the annoyed journalists who emailed back, yelling at the PR pro for wasting their time.

Nor do you see the editors that you’ve lost permanently.

When you eblast off-target information to an outlet constantly, you’re teaching the editors to ignore you. You’ve” trained” them to believe annoying, useless things from your business. And thus, you’re blacklisted.

You’ve committed the cardinal sin of internet relationships without even realizing it!

It’s very cruel to the business, because they’re paying the PR firm to enhance their relationships with the media, never kill them! Worst of all, they had no way of knowing the lakes were poisoned. Many they’d know is that their PR company was producing diminishing returns … until there’s nothing left at all.

And by then it’s very soon.

With this case in head, think about the common, run-of-the-mill American who heard yet ANOTHER angle from the Democrats about” Trump is Hitler”.

Would they pay interest? Did it proceed them?

Or did the Democrats” coach” them to overlook whatever they say next because they’re unserious, unscrupulous, and undeserving of their time? &nbsp,

Associated: MAGA Has Birthed a New, Diverse Republican Party

To any level-headed American, comparing one to Hitler is the lowest of the low. He is the most obscene, most ugly monster of the modern era, the Holocaust’s engineer, and a Nazi wartime warmonger. It’s never a minor incident. &nbsp,

If you’re gonna call one Hitler, you better take the records!

And once again, the year is 2024. By now, Americans have a great sense of Donald Trump’s personality and both of his different personalities. They know his strengths, weaknesses, foolishness, and oddities. They know sometimes ( to quote Joe Rogan ) he says” crazy s**t”.

But they also know he’s NOT Adolf Hitler!

That was the invisible value of the Democrats ‘” Trump is Hitler” PR campaign. It was n’t just time and money they lost. &nbsp, It furthermore cost them their trust. &nbsp,

And it made Americans ignore everyone else they had to declare.

In retrospect, it’s actually kind of impressive: The Democrats could n’t even get calling someone Hitler right! Also THAT backfired. &nbsp,

Then that takes skills!

Source credit