According to royal biographer Robert Hardman, King Charles II I’s actions must go hand in hand with Prince William and Prince Harry, and he cannot engage in unilateral discussions without the Prince of Wales‘s consent.
Hardman, writer of Charles III, New King, New Court, spoke to the Daily Beast about the challenges surrounding the shattered family active, stressing that any action by the King must include both sons likewise.
The King should work with both sons, not just one, in all of his actions. He ca n’t have unilateral discussions if William is n’t in agreement”, Hardman said, stressing the necessity of a” three-way process” for any reconciliation.
The author claimed that Prince William’s consent is necessary because it might have an impact on how the general consumer perceives any choices made.
Hardman acknowledged the issues, saying,” It’s challenging, and a condition nobody wants. But whatever the method forward is, it has to operate for everyone”.
The author also believes that Prince William’s relationship with Prince Harry was considerably strained by Prince Harry’s memoir, Spare, because it was about private family matters that were exposed in public. According to Hardman,” Things that occurred between the siblings were made people,” which is incredibly important for someone like William who values private.
According to the new model of Hardman’s book, King Charles ‘ reluctance to speak with Prince Harry was a result of his worries about getting drawn between Harry and the British authorities over his security arrangements.
