In some ways, it’s a pity because, over the past few years, morons have become so easily identified because they are the ones who reveal their nouns. One of them has been Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-Make Mine A Double ), who in her brief but tumultuous career in the public eye has been (among many other things ) a reliable predictor of cultural changes, which is to say, she has been a reactionary apparatchik who has always, no matter what, followed the public’s prevailing range. The attractive AOC has really begun to signal a significant cultural change by removing her X bio’s adjectives. Has the transgender crisis reached a plateau and is now waning? Was be.  ,
Advertisement
On Thursday, a well-known Close Wokeness X account reported that AOC had silently removed the” she/her” classification from her profile. The first time the word was mentioned was absurd, as if anyone needed to be informed that she was n’t a dude, but that was what the left wanted, and AOC accepted that position.
In reality, in Nov. 2022, AOC apologized for not informing the universe that she was a she. She responded to a question from The New York Post that she had been asked to include her real names in her Instagram profile and that she had apologized. They used to be on it. Let me enter to see if I may put them. I guess they fell off, but I’ll put them on correctly now”.
They’re also it, although they “fell off” her X bill. Not only does AOC’s X profile no longer listing her nouns, it even lists her as a” US Congresswoman”. This counts because up until AOC removed her nouns from the profile, it said she was a” US Representative”. But AOC appears to have taken out one instance in which she only uses the term “woman” to increase another.  ,
In fact, but, with both shifts AOC has moved in a more traditional way. Up until a few years ago, no one ever made an announcement about their adjectives because it was so blatantly clear. On the other hand, adult staff have been called” congressman” since the days of Congresswoman Jeannette Rankin (R-Mont. ), who in 1917 became the first woman to serve in the House of Representatives.
Advertisement
So what’s following for AOC? Cooking lessons on TikTok? Many people are pointing fingers at the departure of her nouns as a reflection of the current trends in American society, regardless of what she might have planned. Ocasio-Cortez is proving to be a wise legislator who cares about her constituents. She instantly emailed her supporters who voted for both her and Trump to explain why. Instead of just haughtily mocking them about their “racism,” as she did most of her Democratic colleagues, she appeared to be more interested in learning, than in finding out.  ,
Instead of reverting to the well-known buzzwords, the pronoun discarding appeared to be another instance of paying attention to the actual trends. X person Paul A. Szypula, who has over a quarter million fans, wrote:” If you’re wondering why AOC ditched her pronouns in her profile, it might have something to do with the large migration from the Democrat Party by Spanish citizens. Many people respect traditional values but do n’t like gender theory. They care about low prices and strong borders” . ,
 ,  ,  , Related: Pelosi’s Latest Great Stay Is Too Much Even for the Washington Post
Advertisement
Sometimes. Or maybe it’s just a miscalculation, as in 2022 when the nouns “fell off” her Instagram account. A notable finding was made on Friday by The Washington Times that made it clear that AOC’s decision to remove the pronouns from her X accounts could not have been a backlash to Trump’s victory:” Ms. Ocasio-Cortez did so on March 4; she did so on April 2; she did it later. Does that imply that she anticipated the gender-specific reaction nine weeks before the vote? Or that no one has been able to find out about the technical staffer’s unintentional deletion of her nouns? The Washington Times has contacted the congresswoman’s department for post”.
If it was just a blunder, yet, AOC is taking her sweet time about correcting it. At the time of writing, it appears as though she has n’t responded to the Times or inserted any pronouns back into her X bio.  ,
Thus, it’s possible that AOC is actually monitoring and interpreting historical trends. After all, 2028 will be here before we know it, and the Democrats are going to have to run anyone for leader. What about a virtuous socialist who marched to a more sensible and sincere position before returning to a somewhat more reasonable position? AOC might be giving herself the perfect opportunity to win the Democratic Party’s dying hand.
Advertisement