What Ignited Antisemitism in North America?

The reasons used throughout history to love, eliminate, abuse, and death Jews have been many and diverse. Zionists were charged with murder, poisoning wells, slaughtering Christian children for matza, the unleavened flatbread food that was needed for Easter, and bringing the Black Plague. In post-Christian, National Socialist places, they were accused of being communists, but more important, an inferior contest, in post-Christian, Socialist places, they were accused of being entrepreneurs. &nbsp,

In Muslim countries or wherever they have spread, Islam believe that Islam is supersessionist, that it has superseded Judaism and Christianity, proving them unsuitable or wrong. For that reason, Jews and Christians, while recognized as” People of the Book”, document. e. the Bible, may be superior to Muslims. A fundamental and unwavering characteristic of Islam is power. Jews and Christians in Muslim places are given the status of dhimma, or “protected”, as long as they fulfill their tradition and material commitments as employees. ( Dhimma is a privileged status compared to “infidel”, who under Islam may lawfully be killed, enslaved, kidnapped and ransomed, or ignored. ) Defiant Jews and Christians, such as those who claim independence and self-governance, may become justly killed. &nbsp,

In all of these situations, Zionists were portrayed as a threat to the social order and the population’s well-being. By identifying a tiny minority of the population as the cause of these dangers, it was probable to “purify” world by punishing, expelling, or exterminating this minority “scapegoat” people. The stampeding majority found some emotional support and even satisfaction in this fictional remedy for incomprehensible social issues or uncontrollable natural phenomena. We know that at least some Nazi SS did not enjoy shooting unarmed Hebrew people, children, and old Jews, but they were told, and probably some believed, it was their responsibility to the Motherland. &nbsp,

Antisemitism is a key component of the Islamic jihad ( holy war ) that fights for supremacy around the world. Depending on the circumstances, this terrorism is carried out using a variety of methods. In contemporary Europe, “immigration jihad” ( immigration jihad ), which aims to occupy European nations and take control through electoral politics, is not advanced by military invasion. In the meanwhile, Jews are attacked throughout Europe by Muslims, generally on an ad hoc basis. The planned and organized Amsterdam massacre, which targeted both visiting Israelis and regional Jews, was a new different. We can anticipate more rioting in Europe in the future after the success of this riot, which was largely caused by the police’s lack of response. &nbsp,

In the Middle East, Muslim evil forces, such as Hamas, Hezbollah, and several Shi’a armies, inspired and supported by Iran, plan to destroy Israel and exterminate the Israeli people. These programs have been attempted to be realized by the Hamas war and the 2023-24 Hezbollah attacks. If successful, the defiant Jews, violating Islamic power by independently governing their own nation and winning war against Muslim forces, would get eliminated. Another way that Jews violate Islamic law is that Muslim-held lands had constantly remain under Muslim rule. ( That is why Muslims claim that they are legitimately a part of Spain and Portugal, while some others believe they are once more in charge. ) Possibly through emigration warfare. &nbsp,

Because Muslims are only a small majority in North America, jihad is carried out through various methods. Arab action groups lobby for criticism of Israel through BDS, the “boycott, defund, and censure” activity, and” Apartheid Week” presentations. Some non-Muslim students and professors are committed to the cause as a matter of justice, and these have been concentrated on institutions. The common events following the Hamas crimes committed against Israelis, Israeli Americans, and Israeli Canadians were manifested in marches, sit-ins, activities, and leakage of passing at many North American universities. Problems on Jews were both direct, such as not allowing them onto school or into certain school facilities, such as libraries, and often immediate, including taunts, threats, and actual attacks. &nbsp,

Antisemitism did not originate in America. The founding fathers saw the people’s Christian faith as the foundation of their society, the rights that God had for people, and the faith of the ancient Hebrews as the foundation of their faith. Many people were experts on Judaism and had studied Hebrew. Hebrew was a common subject of study in America’s early colleges. A slightly different story exists in Canada. In Catholic Quebec, however, the ancient” Christ-killer” epithet lived on in the 20th century, repeated from the pulpits. Even in the new secular Quebec, antisemitism continues as a reflex in the French population. While Jews in Quebec had always been subject to discrimination, violent attacks on Jews were rare. &nbsp,

However, antisemitism has changed in Canada and the United States, becoming more and more prevalent. This is seen in the public enthusiasm for the rapes, torture, and murder of Israelis by Muslim terrorists, in the arson, firearm, and bomb attacks on Jewish schools and places of worship, and in the increasing number of violent attacks on Jews in the streets or wherever they are found. &nbsp,

Why specifically have non-Muslim Americans and Canadians reacted violently to Israel and the Jews? &nbsp,

The answer is to found in the “progressive” ideology that dominates both countries under the Obama-Biden-Harris Democrat administration and the Trudeau Liberal administration. These administrations have adopted neo-Marxist theories regarding the nature of society and implemented policies to address alleged “injustices” as defined by those theories. The understanding that every society is characterised by a class conflict between evil rulers and innocent victims is at the heart of these theories. Political policies, priorities, and regulations are directed to punish and exclude the oppressors and to raise up and benefit the victims. &nbsp,

Feminists started using these theories in the 1960s to argue that the evil male patriarchy was oppressing all women. Note that this formulation favors the collectivism of large demographic groups over the much-pledged respect for individuals and individualism in North American polities. This approach also rejects the fundamental assumption that all differences between categories must result from prejudice and discrimination, replacing it with the fundamental idea that people can succeed only through capability and application. For feminists, males are the unworthy recipients of statuses and benefits. &nbsp,

North American blacks and those who supported the neo-Marxist theory were also drawn to it. Blacks were statistically “underrepresented” in various prestigious positions in education, politics, and other professions. This was attributed solely to discrimination. All BIPOC ( black, indigenous, people of color ) were believed to be suffering from discrimination. The villains in this case were the majority whites, but also successful minorities such as Asians, deemed” white adjacent”, and Jews, labeled “hyper-white”. Success was also seen as the outcome of discrimination against BIPOC in this instance. Success was seen as the result not of effort and achievement, but of theft. &nbsp,

The gay liberation movement gained momentum from the support of women and BIPOC. LGBTQ2S++ ( lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans, queer, two spirit ) faced restrictions and prejudice in the face of “heteronormativity”. The movement fought for the removal of legal and informal restrictions and public acceptance. According to some, disputes over legal status and public acceptance are the result of prejudice and discrimination against heterosexuals” straights.”

Females, BIPOC, and LGBTQ2s+ + were classed together as “marginalized”, “underserved” victims of oppression in a unified” social justice” movement. The U.S.’s Biden Democrat and Canadian’s Trudeau Liberal administrations politicized this movement. These administrations institutionalized the” social justice” movement and its operationalization in “diversity, equity, and inclusion” largely by means of executive orders and financial incentives. This was seen clearly in mandates for government offices and agencies, government-adjacent organizations such as universities, granting agencies, and professional organizations. An entire new profession of bureaucrats was invented to enforce” social justice” policy: DEI ( diversity, equity, inclusion ) mandates and restrictions. These DEI political commissars imposed” social justice” laws and punished any deviation or opposition. &nbsp,

What” social justice” means in practice is the institutional favoring of the new “protected classes” of females, BIPOC, and LGBTQ2s++, plus some others, such as Muslims, and the demeaning, sidelining, and exclusion of men, whites, Christians, and Jews. Reverse discrimination is the order of the day, and is clearly expressed in the advertisements for new posts which explicitly exclude males, whites, heterosexuals, and anyone not on the “protected” list. Jews, now considered white, are disappearing from those institutions. The results can be seen in the statistical dominance of females in government offices and among university students, professors, and administrators, and the absence of Jews. ” Social justice” was labeled “anti-racism”, but in fact is the new racism with different victims. &nbsp,

In the social justice scheme, Jews are doubly guilty of oppression, because they support Israel, which is characterized as a “white, colonial settler, imperialist society” that had displaced and oppressed the “indigenous, people of color, the Palestinians”. Although these descriptions are inaccurate, it seems that social justice movement fans do n’t care about the facts. They only know that there are good guys, the innocent oppressed, and the bad guys, the evil oppressors. Anti-colonialism against the indigenous people of color requires that they condemn the newly “white” North American Jews who support them in this procrustean model. If that were not enough, Israelis defending themselves against Hamas, which vowed to exterminate Israelis, were accused—against every dictionary definition, treaty, and historical example —of “genocide”. No imaginary violation by Jews goes unclaimed. &nbsp,

The ongoing pogrom in North America against Israel and Jews is inspired by the ongoing, worldwide Islamic war against Islam-non-compliant, disobedient Jews. The catalyst that started the pro-Hamas pogrom in North America starting on October 7th, 2023 is North Americans with Islamic backgrounds and foreign students with Islamic countries. But what was the source of the fuel for the fire of the pogrom, the multitudes of non-Muslim North American university student, professors, and administrators, as well as the activists and NGO employees? These are the woke warriors, the activists for” social justice” striking out at the white, colonial settler, evil “oppressors” who victimize the innocent and helpless “people of color” Palestinians. Waves of mostly college girls mobilized to celebrate the rape, torture, and murder of Jews and to worship the authors of those atrocities, Hamas, the Palestinian chapter of the Muslim Brotherhood. &nbsp,

Among all of the evil oppressors, why the Jews? Why not the oppressors of the male and female levels, which are much more common? It has proven easy enough to demonize, sideline, and even exclude whites. But they still make up the majority of the population: 60 % in the U. S. and 70 % in Canada. Woke attackers would be seriously outnumbered. Men only make up around 50 % of the population, but who is going to assault them—the angry college girls?

Jews are attractive as a target because they are a small, weak, and scattered population, given to religion, professions and commerce. They are not dockhands or teamters, but they could presumably shield themselves from college girls who are raging. As a small and weak “oppressor” population, they make an ideal target. Ideal to bring” social justice” without too much risk. And, when it is Jews, the Muslims are happy to pitch in. &nbsp,

In an imaginable morality drama, Jews once more serve as universal villains and vulnerable scapegoats. Once well-poisoners, child-murderers, God-killers, a sub-human inferior race, and anti-social capitalist-communists, now a colonial settler and apartheid enforcer, a violator of” social justice” and guilty of “genocide”. &nbsp, Feminist intersectionism has done its work well. &nbsp,

Source credit