One of the many issues that drove the remaining absolutely insane during Donald Trump’s first term as president was his” Muslim Ban”, which the creation media represented as a racist,” Antisemitic” effort to keep poor, innocent, vulnerable, weeping Muslim grandmothers out of the state. The” Muslim Ban” was so well-known that Old Joe Biden repealed it the day it first appeared to be in office, drawing passionate support from both domestically and internationally. The whole discussion over this was violent, as it never really was a” Muslim Ban” in the first place, and then watch for more frenzy: Trump is bringing it back.  ,
Advertisement
The” Muslim Ban,” or” Travel Ban,” or whatever you want to call it, was always a common-sense security measure, and, Lord knows, we sure could use a few of those these days, according to Todd Bensman of the Center for Immigration Studies, which published a report in the New York Post on Thursday.  ,
Bensman information that the last edition of this restrictions prohibited emigration from thirteen states: Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria, Yemen, North Korea, Burma, Eritrea, Kyrgyzstan, Nigeria, Sudan and Tanzania. The keen-eyed reader will notice that North Korea, Burma, and Tanzania are n’t Muslim countries at all, that Eritrea and Nigeria are about evenly divided between Muslims and Christians, and that Kyrgyzstan, while about 90 % Muslim, is a former Soviet republic in which most of the Muslims are highly secularized and hardly interested in waging jihad.  ,
These 13 nations shared the fact that they both refused to provide sufficient information about those who wanted to enter the country. They could have been offenders, they could have been extremists, they could have been sociopaths, and we never would have known it. That lack of information did not, however, problem Old Joe Biden and his minions, who were intent on flooding the country with as many workers as possible, thus weakening national unity, diluting the world’s cultural figure, and gaining a strong voting center for the Democrats. For the communist idealist Democrats, there was no problem.
Advertisement
For Americans, but, there was. According to Bensman,” no longer before President Donald Trump, in his first name, issued his so-called” go ban” on 13 nations,” Somalia-born Syed Razak Ali Artan slammed into a crowd of Ohio State University students and got out slashing with a butcher knife, injuring 11 people. Campus police shot the young jihadist refugee to death, ending the Nov. 28, 2016 attack”. If Trump’s travel ban had been in place, Bensman goes on to say that Artan would never have been able to harm even one American.
Abdul Razak Ali Artan was n’t a singular case, either. Another Somali Muslim migrant, Mohammad Barry, in February 2016 stabbed multiple patrons at a restaurant owned by an Israeli Arab Christian, Dahir Adan, another Somali, in October 2016 stabbed mall shoppers in St. Cloud, Minn., while screaming” Allahu akbar”. All in all, 72 jihad terrorists had entered the U. S. from the countries listed in Trump’s initial immigration ban before it was instituted. But once the travel bans came into effect, suddenly we did n’t see as much of this as we had before. What a coincidence!
Related:  , Big Endorsement: Disgraced Deep Stater Says Gaetz ‘ Could n’t Get Hired by the FBI ‘
Europe also exhibited warning signs. All of the jihadis who murdered 130 people in Paris in November 2015 had recently emigrated to Europe as refugees. Since then, numerous other Muslim immigrants have carried out “lone wolf” jihad attacks on European cities ‘ streets.
Advertisement
To the left, to consider such evidence is “racist” and” Islamophobic”. The problem with virtue-signaling by our moral superiors in Washington, however, is that they never have to deal with the consequences of their actions, ordinary Americans do. Trump was right to confront them and resolve their legal disputes in order to impose a travel ban during his first term. Once he returns to the Oval Office, it would be wise to rescind it. Watch, however, for the same old howls of dismay and rage to start up again. What other means of defense does the left have besides rage?
