The left blared the myth that the legal battle between then-former president Donald Trump was all about “upholding the rules” and had nothing to do with the upcoming election for decades. They asserted that Trump was a genius of crime and that this claim was confirmed when a judge of “peers” found him guilty in a May show trial in Manhattan.
The Manhattan lawsuit brought against Trump is then stale after Trump won the election. After the previous chairman was re-elected by a landslide success, New York District Attorney Alvin Bragg agreed to continuously wait Donald Trump’s imprisonment, which had been scheduled for next week.
But surely there should be no difficulty about sentencing a 34-time “felon” like Trump— unless the situation was not about” justice” or the “law”.
Bragg claimed that Trump had paid Michael Cohen, a lawyer at the time, to cover up an alleged occasion, but he made no specific allegations that such alleged behavior was against the law. It’s a case that the Federal Elections Commission, Department of Justice ( DOJ), and the Southern District of New York’s U. S. Attorney’s Office declined to bring.
Bragg, in his devotion to kill Trump, enlisted the help of Colangelo ( who was formerly No. 3 ) and claimed that Trump should have treated the alleged payments as campaign expenses rather than legal fees. He was hired to” jump-start” the investigation. He claimed the payments were made to control the 2016 vote. Cohen, but, blew up Bragg’s reasoning while on the walk, confirming to the judge that when the complaints first surfaced in 2011, Trump was concerned about how the story may affect his family.
Trump’s imprisonment was scheduled for Nov. 26. Only over a week ago, Colangelo asked Judge Juan Merchan to , wait proceedings , until his team was find out its course of action following Trump’s success. Merchan gave prosecutors until Nov. 19 to make a choice.
Bragg made it clear that the sentencing could be postponed until after Trump’s approaching expression in his Tuesday notice to the court.
According to Bragg, “[C]onsideration must be given to several non-dismissal options,” such as the deferral of all remaining judicial proceedings until the Defendant’s upcoming presidential term.
Tuesday’s letter from Bragg and his team agreeing to delay proceedings means one thing — this case was n’t about” justice” or” the law”. It was about trying to toss Trump in jail so he would n’t be able to land in the White House and trying to interfere in the 2024 election.
The Federalist’s election journalist, Brianna Lyman. With a diploma in global political economy, Brianna received her diploma from Fordham University. Her job has been featured on Newsmax, Fox News, Fox Business and RealClearPolitics. Following Brianna on X: @briannalyman2
