On Wednesday, an angry, standing-room-only group called for the departure of Bucks County Commissioner Diane Ellis-Marseglia, who made national headlines last week when she fiercely said she would reject election law and count poorly cast ballots. The common likewise requested that Democratic Commissioner Robert Harvie Jr. resign, who supported her action and voted to approve the strategy.
In violation of Pennsylvania rules, several districts with Democratic leadership voted to matter improper votes. But Ellis-Marseglia’s feedback, made while deciding which interim votes to rely, crystallized the attitude of state election officials ignoring the legislation. The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has since reaffirmed its ruling to no count votes that were cast incorrectly.  ,
” Precedent by a court does n’t matter anymore in this country, and people violate laws anytime they want”, Ellis-Marseglia said last week. There is no other thing more important than counting votes, so I’ll take it all the way if I violate this rules.”
During Wednesday’s standard director meeting, she apologized.
” Next Thursday when I spoke … the love in my spirit got the best of me, and I apologize repeatedly for that”, Ellis-Marseglia said. I do n’t believe I am the only one who felt frustrated that day. The Supreme Court’s regulations, which have changed over time, cause several districts to become confused and perplexed. I anticipated the jury making a decision on this.
But she already had a lot of quality info. In Pennsylvania judge, a number of years ago, a dispute arose regarding the counting of email ballots that were incomplete or completely undated. According to Pennsylvania rules, these votes are not to be counted. Before the vote, the state Supreme Court ordered regions not to qualify for vote. Commissioners were advised not to depend those vote by the Bucks County lawyer. Gene DiGirolamo, the democratic commissioner, lost the three-member board vote to not count illegal ballots.  ,
Ellis-Marseglia said her comments were taken “out of context” and” clipped”, implying that people just did n’t understand what she meant. However, a full saving of her remarks on the state website reveals that she had understood everything.
” I have actually been contacted by hundreds of people, and I’m being truthful with you: all of them involved awful, awful obscenities”, Ellis-Marseglia said.
When contacting Ellis-Marseglia for reply, The Federalist used expert language. She did not respond.
She said her career has been threatened, as well as members of her family and state workers.
” I made a miscalculation, and because I am an elected official, I am held to a much higher standard than everybody else. I’m sorry, citizens of the country, and I’ll job difficult for you and make every effort to avoid repeating this error. One more thing to understand: When I unintentionally used the term precedent in my discussion of interim votes, I was referring to the US Supreme Court and the precedence that has been lost on numerous issues, including Roe v. Wade.
At this remark, the crowd groaned, booed, and offered far eye-rolling. She yelled at her hand to stop them.  ,
” However, I took my anger out on the Pennsylvania Supreme Court, many of whom are friends of mine and who I esteem and whose judgments are complicated, hard, and important. In this large lake, I’m just a little fish. On CNN or Twitter, I do n’t have a megaphone. Or I’m not a position minister. I do n’t run a presidential campaign. I have only had the chance to correct the record at this point. … Now is the only chance I have to quit the compounding. And I do n’t really think I could apologize anymore, but I am truthfully sorry”.
Afterwards, a participant in the audience remarked that the market was more likely to be sorry for her.
Around 200 people showed up at the 10:30 a.m. gathering to express their frustration and request Ellis-Marseglia and Harvie’s resignations. This is not an easy task for people to do during regular working hours. Some demanded that those who omitted the laws be charged with contempt of court or with other offenses.  ,
Loudspeakers had three minutes to make their place during public opinion, and their microphone was therefore turned off.  ,
One speech, an elected prosecutor of votes, said he has served for more than 25 votes.
I swear an oath to conduct the vote in accordance with Pennsylvania laws each time I serve. You take a similar vow to do your duties as directors, according to the law. Throughout this vote period, you’ve done a bad job, as demonstrated by the many comments around today. You deliberately and deliberately and against the advice of your attorney this past week allowed the counting of unlawful ballots, according to the election judge.  ,
” If I authorized unsuitable voters to cast ballots on Election Day, I would be immediately removed from office and brought to justice by the city lawyer.” You and I mock the election process and undermine the legitimacy of the vote-rigging method. You two may be impeached and brought to justice. Would the state a favour and resign”.
The different speakers had related texts, adding that the commission, who have donated to Sen. Bob Casey and were endorsed by him, are political, and there is no area for a political thinking when they are serving on the board of elections.
At the end of common comments, it appeared that Harvie was going to create a post, but the crowd was never silent, and he immediately adjourned the conference. However, after the state Supreme Court decided not to count the votes he intended to qualify, Harvey issued a speech.
He criticized the “baseless allegations that members of the board were attempting to influence the results of an election by choosing to rely particular mail-in and temporary ballots.” These claims are unequivocally nonsense” . ,
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has informed us immediately that registered Bucks County voters ‘ ballots cast in this election will not be counted in the context of the Nov. 5, 2024, General Election. In this case, we specifically needed the clearness we needed from the judges. The Board of Elections may, of course, follow the court’s instructions.
Despite Harvie’s experienced ignorance and confusion, he did not need to wait for the Pennsylvania Supreme Court to replicate itself. The judge, the law, and the state solicitor made it clear that ballots that were erroneously dated should not be tallied.
This and other local poll plays in Pennsylvania are part of Democrats ‘ post-election struggle for seats in the country’s 2024 U. S. Senate race. In a nearby election that is currently undergoing a recall, Republican Sen. Bob Casey defeated him in the end. Before the recall was started, McCormick was given the go-ahead by the Associated Press, but Casey refuses to accept the result.  ,  ,
The Federalist’s Beth Brelje is a journalist for votes. She is an award-winning analytical columnist with years of internet experience.
