Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, original defence minister Yoav Gallant, Ibrahim Al Masri, and Mohammed Deif of Hamas were all on arrest warrants, according to Rick Moran of PJ Media. Deif is dead, but good luck with serving that permit.
Advertisement
Since neither the United States nor Israel are participants to the ICC, they are exempt from the absurd crony body’s rules. However, many different nations do as well.
On Friday morning’s episode of Albert Mohler’s radio, Albert Mohler stated that” the functional result is going to be that Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel will have to monitor where he travels in order for him to be detained.” And please be aware that if this is threatened against the Israeli prime minister, it can and almost certainly will be used against a current US President or, for that matter, a former US President.
” Disturbingly, many European countries, including close friends to the United States, have indicated that they believe the ICC, the International Criminal Court, clearly applied these imprisonment warrants to the Israeli prime minister”, he added.
One of those countries is the United Kingdom. If Netanyahu were to travel to the UK, the far-left Labour authorities said it would follow the decision.
Recommended:  , Confidence in the UK’s New Government Is Dropping
The Spectator’s Katy Balls information:
If Benjamin Netanyahu enters Britain, he could be detained. Following the ICC’s release of arrest warrants for Israel’s Prime Minister, former Israeli defense minister Yoav Gallant, and Hamas ‘ Mohammed Deif, who is rumored to be dead already, comes the International Criminal Court ( ICC ) has issued arrest warrants. The court defended the two Israeli politicians ‘ right to have their arrests based on their shared criminal responsibility for” the crimes against humanity of death, harassment, and other cruel acts” as well as the war crime of starvation as a means of war.
Â
In reaction, the Israeli government has – understandably – heavily criticised the view. The United States, which is not a part of the ICC, has also “basically” rejected the prosecutor’s decision, claiming that the ICC has no” control over this subject.” When Donald Trump takes office, the approaching Trump administration has warned of a” robust response to the anti-Semitic bias of the ICC and UN come January.” Downing Street, in contrast, has stated that once the English domestic process has begun, it will adhere to the ICC’s decision.
Advertisement
Obviously, the choice reveals the dramatic differences between the ruling Labour group and the Conservatives, who are more susceptible to help Israel. Labour defeated the Liberals in July’s primaries.
” Starmer’s official said the UK authorities would agree with its legal obligations but added that there was no’ social equivalence’ between Israel and Hamas”, Balls writes, adding later,” Now, dark foreign minister Priti Patel]of the Conservatives ] has criticised Starmer’s answer, describing the subpoena as concerning and urging the government to ‘ condemn and challenge the ICC’s choice.'”
The UK government’s statement shows that it would support an international organization that treats Israel unfairly in its struggle for survival. Netanyahu must also be more cautious when traveling.
Mohler said:
However, we also need to be aware that Israel will soon be shown who it is and who it is no. Additionally, who is and is not a friend is a factor in the need for countries to stand up to criminal companies. Suddenly, we are not saying that Israel has done no wrong. We would n’t say that about the United States. In our own defense efforts, it is to state the cause is virtuous. And it’s also virtuous to support Israel in this regard.
According to Balls,” Starmer risks a political split with both the incoming Trump administration and Israel if he continues to hold his placement.” Left-wing institutions are siding with totalitarian organizations in place of standing up for themselves when they do so.
Advertisement
