Medieval ‘Social Justice’ With a Contemporary Twist

Does one impeach a sorceress, a magician or a deceased person? In the Middle Ages, for “impeachments” were a point of the” social fairness” perspective of the time. When one considers” the level to which alchemy and pagan superstition ( climate change, DEI, etc. ) have become predominant” in today’s cultural and political milieu, writes panoptic scholar Robert Orr ( personal communication ), it might be appropriate to revive the tradition, this time with just cause. On the democratic level, there are many individuals who are ripe for prosecution and trial, including those who are at the top of the hierarchy. Orr says,” Place the corpse fronting for the Demsheviks is n’t that strange an idea.”

One might consider the famous or infamous Cadaver Synod in 897, where Pope Formosus ‘ body was exhumed from its grave and transported to Rome’s Basilica for execution. According to Joseph Dispenza’s interesting The Death and Trial of Pope Formosus, the corpse was clad in catholic vestments, seated on a crown, &nbsp, provided with a chapel officer to converse on his behalf, and forced to answer the charges—as ideal he could—of perjury, defilement of church doctrine, and improper accession to the catholic throne. This first was an important claim, implying that he had been defrauded by papal scams. Formosus was declared innocent on all matters, all his decisions, meetings and decretals annulled, the papal garments stripped from the brain, and the body flung into the Tiber. &nbsp,

Of course, the accused in the current fictional situation is in a state of connector decrepitude and is regarded as “dead” just figuratively. He may be depicted as cruel, cruel, dirty, crooked, a practitioner of the dark arts and a master of necromantic ritual, a champion of the pishogue, and so socially “dead”. &nbsp, In any event, some believe he may get lashed to the Constitutional interest. &nbsp,

The United States may provide to each State in this Union a Republican form of government, as defined in Article IV of the U.S. Constitution, and protect each of them from invasion, in accordance with the” Promise Clause.” As Orr explains, the meaning is clear: the federal government has act if a condition is attacked by another land. The federal government is lawfully and democratically required to prevent invaders from entering and to not permit or even invite them. It is obvious that ten to twenty million illegal immigrants are occupying a country’s borders, and that this is a disaster as predicted in Jean Raspail’s terrifying 1987 film The Camp of the Saints, which should have given us a warning about what was about to happen. In Bob Woodward and Robert Costa’s hit Peril, those who allowed for an attack to occur include undoubtedly committed an indictable offense, much like General Mark Milley conspiring against Trump with his Foreign equivalent General Li Zuocheng. If it were to occur, it would be considered treachery and the offender would need to be charged.

Orr also points to the Third Amendment, which states:” No Soldier may, in time of peace been quartered in any home, without the consent of the Landlord, nor in time of war, but in a way to be prescribed by law”. The settling of vast quantities of refugees, which Trump has called a” crisis”, a “war”, and an “invasion”, in areas like Springfield, Ohio, thoroughly burdening and generally terrifying the local community, may count as treasonous as well. In terms of how quickly these interlopers spread and profoundly destabilize the country, as Jean Raspail remarked, they may be referred to as” soldiers.” ( One must be skeptical of the usual run of suborned media “fact-checkers” who deny or downplay the urgency of the situation. ) One thinks, too, of the immense surge of illegals crossing the Canadian border into small towns like Swanton, Vermont and Champlain, New York—an invasion in everything but name. Orr compellingly argues that If Americans took their Constitution seriously, several recent presidents—Bush&nbsp, fils, Obama and Biden—would all have been impeached and cashiered.

The” social justice” practice of the Middle Ages, which involved witches and heretics being tried in ecclesiastical courts and burned to the ground for allegedly pursuing their immortal souls, is understood as a perversion of actual justice. Impeachment, however, again rightly understood, may be conceived as the political displacement and secular equivalent of the medieval auto-da-fe, with reference to the corrupt, transgressive and destructive behavior of select members of the political elite, the witches and warlocks of the administrative state, in particular the Carters, Clintons, Obamas and Bidens of the progressivist sodality who must be held to account for their nation-killing spells, policies, enactments, and antics. &nbsp,

True, the “great heretics” ‘ actions, according to Michael Frassetto’s The Great Medieval Heretics, altered medieval Europe’s religious intolerance and gradually opened the door to a more enlightened and compassionate era. By contrast, the political establishment in the West today is deeply heretical in the pejorative sense, disrupting public order, abusing the spirit of the oath of office, engaging in serial barratry, ruthlessly persecuting and imprisoning perceived enemies, and imposing a regime of censorship, poverty, social control and punitive legislation upon the citizenry it is supposed to serve.

The social justice of the Middle Ages needs to be updated and redefined as the political justice of the current scene, sparing the innocent, as it should go without saying ( read: Donald Trump ), and focusing on those who should be justifiably purged, whether with effective censure, removal of privileges, or merited jail sentences. The Formosus iniquities are prevalent in contemporary culture and need to be addressed with urgency, according to Mutandis. This, we might say, is what is now at stake. &nbsp,

Source credit