Over the past four years, Joe Biden’s mental and physical decrease has become more mainstream. Then a Wall Street Journal part information just how much power Biden’s handlers had over his management, including during key moments such as the fatal pull-out from Afghanistan.
The Dec. 19 piece,” How the White House Functioned With a Diminished Biden in Charge”, illustrates that, as many Americans ( and probably world leaders ) suspected, Biden was not fully in charge much of the time.
Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin was a member of the cabinet at the start of the management who was regularly scheduled to attend Biden’s political daily lecture “on a circular basis each month.” According to The Wall Street Journal report, that lecture was followed by a secret one-on-one conversation between Austin and Biden.  ,  ,
” But in the past two years — a time when the wars in Ukraine and Gaza demanded the government’s interest — Austin’s offer to the lecture came less often, to the point where the one-on-one gathering was sometimes scheduled”, the report said. ” When the one-on-one discussions did take place, they were more commonly virtual discussions, no in-person. Austin had also schedule a meeting with the president if necessary.
It is one instance among many, revealing how in business and on the plan road, Biden’s people — no Trump — were running the show.
Congress had no abandon this. We need congressional hearings to find out who gave him cover, leaving the United States aimless and prone to a myriad of threats, both domestically and internationally.
How many people turned their backs on? Quite a few. After all, we are speaking out loudly about Biden’s restrictions, yet he is still in business, allegedly making significant decisions like selling off material for the boundary wall at cheap basement prices. All while Biden is unable to find a way to an end.  ,
” At events, advisers frequently repeated directions to him, such as where to enter or exit a level, that would be visible to the average person”, The Wall Street Journal part said.
It demonstrates various improper ways handlers attempted to keep Biden’s situation a secret. Biden’s conference attendees were advised to keep meetings brief and focused. In the last two decades, sessions have decreased. Senior advisers frequently took over positions during management meetings that were usually held by the president.
According to The Wall Street Journal, team members had no control over who Biden spoke to and what they said. Meetings were held “later in the day” when Biden was most sensitive, and if he was having a bad day, the meeting may be canceled. Staff played more of a part in running his plan than previous president, said the statement, “based on conversations with almost 50 people”.
What has become of our system of accounts? The people in power, particularly those in Biden’s government and those who met with him, were unable to stop this nonsense. Why did they? It was working for them.
Due to greed and a desire for power, those who helped conceal Biden’s flaws did thus. They may not carry positions in the government again because they failed to protect the interests of the country.
Beth Brelje covers The Federalist’s votes coverage. She is an award-winning analytical columnist with years of internet experience.
