An idea that we are speaking with something really admiring, an agent who is on our side, gives rise to that sense of comfort. Of course, this look conceals a very different type of workplace system, one that prioritizes issues that are not always in line with our own. New AI brokers will have much greater influence over what we buy, where we go, and what we read. That is a lot of power, really. AI agents voice to us in admiring tones to make us forget our true allegiance. These are adjustment motors, marketed as smooth advantage.
People are much more likely to give a friendly AI representative full access to them. In a time of persistent isolation and loneliness, people are more prone to manipulation by machines that prey on their need for social network. Every screen transforms into a secret algorithmic theater, displaying a reality that is designed to be most persuasive to a single audience.
Philosophers have been making warnings about this situation for decades. Philosopher and scientist Daniel Dennett said that AI systems that emulate people are in danger because they distract and confuse us while using our most inseparable fears and anxieties, leading to desire and eventually consenting to our own subjugation.
Private AI agents have emerged, giving rise to more subtle forms of power than cookie tracking and cognitive advertising, and perspective itself is being controlled. Energy no longer needs to possess its power with a discernible hand to control information flows; instead, it exerts its power through unnoticeable mechanisms of analytic assistance, molding reality to suit the needs of each individual. It involves altering the physical forms of the world around us.
This control over thoughts is a psychopolitical plan: It directs the situations where our thoughts are born, developed, and expressed. Its strength comes from its intimacy; it penetrates the center of our individuality, bending our inner landscape without our knowledge, while still maintaining the notion of choice and freedom. After all, we are the people asking AI to write that article down or create that picture. We may have the energy of the rapid, but the actual action lies abroad: the design of the program itself. And the more precisely a structure can predict the outcomes, the more personalized the material.
Consider the intellectual relevance of this psychopolitics. Traditional types of intellectual power relied on explicit mechanisms—censorship, propaganda, repression. In contrast, yesterday’s analytic management operates under the radar, infiltrating the brain. It is a shift in how authority is internalized rather than from the outside imposition. A second occupant’s echo chamber is located in the open area of a swift screen.
This brings us to the most absurd factor: AI agents may give off a feeling of security that makes it seem absurd to question them. Who would dare to criticize a program that caters to every need and need and has everything at your disposal? How is it possible to object to endless material tunes? But this so-called advantage is the site of our deepest marginalization. Although AI techniques does appear to be responding to our every need, the odds are stacked: from the information used to train the system to the design decisions that must be made, to the business and marketing requirements that must be met to produce the desired results. In the end, we will be playing an copy activity that eventually defeats us.
