Consider how Democrats were enraged — Outraged! — over issues that some Democrats opposed the counting of the Electoral College votes in early 2021 because of the possibility that Joe Biden received favorable election results in crucial battle claims? The idea of contesting the results of the election was viewed as anti-democratic and heresy.  ,
Advertisement
Despite his enormous success in 2024, the left is once more pressing for Congress to stop Donald Trump from taking business.
Evan Davis, the original editor-in-chief of the Columbia Law Review, and David Schulte, the original editor-in-chief of the Yale Law Journal, argue in a mutual column in The Hill that Congress not only has the power to block Trump from taking office but should.  ,
Their row doesn’t include many new ground. Despite Trump not having done so, it makes reference to Part 3 of the 14th Amendment, which forbids those who have carried out an uprising from holding company. Heck, he hasn’t even been charged with such an offence, and when you consider the fact that scoundrel left-wing lawyers have charged him with all sorts of made-up acts, that says something.
Disqualification is based on protests against the Constitution, not the state. The proof of Donald Trump’s engaged in such rebellion is enormous. Three distinct forums, two of which were entirely contested, had the active participation of Trump’s attorney as the decision was made.  ,
Trump’s subsequent prosecution test was the first to be openly contested. On Jan. 13, 2021, then-President Trump was impeached for “incitement of rebellion”. Seven Republicans joined all Democrats in the Senate trial to secure a conviction lot, but they were unable to obtain the two-thirds bulk needed for business removal. The definition of “inciting uprising” includes “or providing aid and comfort to the opponents thereof” as defined in Section 3.  ,
Advertisement
Additionally, Davis and Schulte point to the Colorado administrative hearing, in which a republican court determined that Trump had engaged in an insurrection, which the U.S. Supreme Court ultimately overturned. They really go through a lot of rings to appear to have a strong legal basis for their argument.
Recommended: Dang! Donald Trump Is the King of Trolling!
They rely on republican arguments that have all failed, not to mention that the basis of their argument is weak. They’re urging Democrats to carry out what was once considered an extraordinary attack on politics, which not only undermined the will of the electors but even subverted the entire political process. The authors make it clear that it’s acceptable to have doubts about a vote in which a Democrat was declared the winner, but that using false arguments to deter a Republican from taking business is also acceptable.
It is clear that the likelihood of congressional Republicans engaging in any activity that might lead to Harris ‘ election as president is slim. Progressives must, however, taking a stand in opposition to Electoral College votes for someone who is barred by the Constitution from holding company unless and until this illness is removed. No less is required by their vow to support and defend the Constitution.
Advertisement
It sure sounds like the left is getting a little insurrection-y by its own requirements.
