Jacqueline Sweet, a US-based journalist, on Sunday said her account on X ( formerly Twitter ) was suspended, and links to her recent article in The Spectator were blocked. An admitted crime idea that an Elon Musk fandom was run by the billionaire himself was exposed in the post was discredited.
Sweet’s research, alongside partners, revealed that the bill in question belonged to Adrian Dittmann, a man presumably living in Fiji, who usually messages in support of Musk. It refuted the widely-proven notion that Musk was using the name Dittmann online.
After Sweet shared her observations on X, Musk humorously responded,” I am Adrian Dittmann. It’s time the world knew”.
Shortly thereafter, Sweet’s account was suspended for allegedly violating laws on” Posting personal information”. Sweet asserting that her article did not contain personal information like phone numbers or pictures, she denied any wrongdoing. People who encountered error messages indicating complex issues were also directed to the content and related site posts by her collaborators.
Sweet speculated that Musk’s effect may include influenced the product’s activities.
In a follow-up content, Matt McDonald, managing director of The Spectator, defended Sweet’s job, emphasising its necessity in addressing propaganda. According to Restaurants, the bit relied exclusively on public data to refute a conspiracy theory of public attention, especially given Musk’s impact globally.
However, Adrian Dittmann officially clarified on X that he is not Elon Musk, dismissing the claims as false. X has not commented on the subject.
