Meta has made a major change to its content moderation approach, moving away from the fact-checking program and adopting a community-driven approach in response to X’s Community Notes. In light of the controversy over censoring during recent elections, the change is seen as a way to reduce mistakes and promote freedom of expression.
The fresh system does rely on customer collaboration to determine the credibility of articles across Facebook, Instagram, and Strands. Although the new construction is touted as a way to motivate people over institutions, some critics have expressed concern about the potential for misinformation and abuse to flourish under it.
This decision comes just a moment after Meta revealed that Dana White, CEO of the Ultimate Fighting Championship, is joining its board of directors. Alongside White, the company even added John Elkann, CEO of Exor, and it investment Charlie Songhurst to its management team. White emphasized his conviction that artificial intelligence and social media are essential for the future, indicating Meta’s dedication to innovation.
Response to Meta’s tolerance reform has been strongly divided. Republican leaders, including President-elect Donald Trump, have praised the shift as a move toward safeguarding free speech. However, technical advocacy organizations and experts warn of the dangers of loosening settings. Some experts believe that balancing appearance and health with the use of the current tolerance tools might have been a more efficient strategy.
As Meta implements this striking change, the judgement may set a pioneering law for community-led moderation—or open the floodgates to unexpected problems.
