An unidentified person has revealed how they duped Fortune newspaper into making false claims about Elon Musk and the social media platform X in an awkward turn for the release. A wider discussion about the reliability of the press and fact-checking practices has been sparked by the event.
Elon Musk is pushing to eliminate times from X messages and planning fresh$ 8 sign-up fees, according to a Fortune article on January 9 that was the start of the discussion. According to the article,” options” claim that Musk intended to ban date stamps from articles on X and impose a fee for account design.
But, immediately after its release, the post was exposed as a fake. The unnamed user who gave the information to Fortune acknowledged to X that they had fabricated the tale to identify the media’s gullibility.
The person wrote in a string that Fortune published an article based on false info I sent to them via an unidentified email address. ” They didn’t even bother to check the information”.
The users revealed that they had posed as disgruntled X employees because they had argued against the alleged treatment of time stamps. Additionally, they shared pictures of their contact conversations with Kaley Hays, a Fortune editor, on X. They described it as” the ultimate trick” and how they managed to entice Hays by spinning this manufactured tale.
” They trusted me and published misleading data. I’m really a strange guy on the internet, but they kept claiming that the info came from their ‘ sources,'” the consumer added.
Fortune was forced to retract the content and issue an apology as a result of the consequences. In a statement, the release admitted that their procurement “did not join our newspaper requirements” and apologised to Musk, X people, and visitors.
Elon Musk is pushing to eliminate times from X content and planning fresh$ 8 sign-up fees, according to Fortune, which retracts the post following the discovery and apologizes in an explanation titled” adjustment” on their website. After the release, Fortune learned that a key figure in this story had purposefully misled our writer through a number of exchanges. The procurement and account do not meet our newspaper requirements, and the tale has been deleted. We express our regret to users, Mr. Musk, and X people.
Musk, a vocal critic of conventional advertising and advocate for voter news, responded to the incident on X, saying,” That’s legacy media for you”.
The private user clarified that their goal was to expose the flaws in how popular media evaluates their stories rather than to damage X’s status. ” It shows how foolish and simply fooled they can be”, they concluded.
