The state and local taxes ( SALT) deduction cap cap, which is a crucial component of the tax cuts for 2017 Trump, was a significant part of the$ 10,000 cap. The vast majority of citizens never require the$ 10,000, but wealthy high-taxed citizens are asking Republicans to lower the cap and give them relief.
Advertisement
Republicans who support it vehemently oppose it. Without those caps, at least$ 130 billion to$ 200 billion would be added to the budget if the cap were raised to$ 100, 000 as the Democrats say is needed.
Even doubling the$ 10, 000 deduction would add up to$ 32 billion to the budget.  ,
Since 2017, home values have soared, particularly in dark claims, meaning that many more people are now subject to the$ 10, 000 cover. The right time seems ripe to raise the SALT helmet, but even those who support it are in disagreement about how much.
Trump is willing to accept the position where he formerly opposed raising the SALT cover. In a meeting with Republicans from high-tax states at Mar-a-Largo, the incoming president said he wants the party to negotiate a” fair number” . ,
Rep. Nicole Malliotakis (R-N. Y. ) The leader “undoubtedly wants to increase the calculation for SALT to provide more pleasure,” the president, according to Politico , “because he knows that our leaders and rulers are crushing citizens.”
In fact, blue state governors and mayors have no interest in adding more income to SALT, whether or not. Every time they want to drive into lower Manhattan, New York just socked commuters with a toll of$ 9. Democrats in the blue state are making the case that Trump has the power to provide tax relief there.
Advertisement
However, the drive has navigate complicated politicians, simply because some GOP members from low-tax red states oppose the calculation as they try to lower spending. Within the SALT conference itself, which has previously had trouble deciding what to ask, there is also turbulent politics. House GOP leaders have privately informed some Republicans that they didn’t properly prepare for the size of the ultimate package and how much money they’ll need to reduce to pay for it without a plan for how far ahead.
Rep. Nick Lalota (R-N) claims that the SALT conversation was finalized at a conference between Trump, two staff members, and 16 people from New York, California, and New Jersey. Y. ), who said in a short interview that he came away “very positive” that Republicans had “find a repair on SALT”. In a conference that lasted more than an hour, some POLITICO members who spoke with them after the conference who ate coconut prawns, pigs in a blanket, and sliders shared the same sentiment. SALT was the main point of conversation, but they also discussed the recent implementation of congestion charges in New York and the fire raging in California.
Trump is even open to changing the cover to keep up with inflation. However, the main discussions will be about how much of a helmet may be, and that’s where things get heated.  ,
Advertisement
Republican in the blue state plan to meet and come to a decision on a cap number that might be appropriate to the majority of the conference. At this point, it seems likely that a tripling of the cover to$ 20, 000 and scanning it would be the best way forward.  ,
Malliotakis, a vital part of the Ways and Means Committee while she sits on the Subcommittee on Tax Policy, suggests limiting the estate tax exemption in SALT, bringing the price tag down considerably.
 ,” If we’re focusing on the middle school and ensuring that they’re the ones getting the pleasure, then we can come up with a range that would be fair”, Malliotakis told Politico.
