British grooming gang scandal and cover-up exposes racial fault lines

The incident dates back several decades, but it continues to this day, and the decision Labour Party has suffered significant political damage internally as a result of long-running allegations of cover-up. It has exposed the dark underbelly of politicians and the length to which people may go, including the treachery of societies most susceptible and associates, to to stay in strength. &nbsp,

Nile Gardiner, chairman of the Margaret Thatcher Center for Freedom at the Heritage Foundation, described the incident as” a scathing indictment of present day Britain”.

He told the Washington Examiner,” I am definitely shocked by what’s happened in the U.K.” ” Our country has become unrecognizable and it is a powder keg” .&nbsp,

Dastardly deeds that have been allowed and omitted by social correctness’s rules suddenly appear to be causing a national reckoning and highlighting the inaction of law enforcement, political leaders, and the media. Despite this, American lawmakers afterwards refused last week to build a federal investigation into the incident after objections to the way the ballot was being put forth. &nbsp,

What is the UK cleaning crew scandal?

The incident dates again to 1997, when thousands of white English girls were gang-after-gang sexually abused and repeatedly raped by men of mainly Muslim Muslim heritage in a number of towns and cities in England’s northern and middlelands. &nbsp,

Due to the high racial tensions in the area, detective Alan Edwards claimed that everyone was” too afraid to address the race element” of the crimes.

Since therefore, cases involving the assaults or gang assaults of largely young, bright, poor women have been referred to as the “grooming groups” incident. &nbsp,

The incident itself, including Elon Musk’s many tweets about it over Christmas and New Year’s, has trained the light again on the terrible crimes themselves that some believe were either not investigated sufficiently or covered up entirely by the political creation. A closer examination of the atrocities revealed that almost every level of government failed the young victims. &nbsp,

According to Gardiner, “multiculturalism has played a significant role in the grooming gangs scandal.” ” It is suspected in Britain this is widely due to a culture of political correctness and unwillingness to arrest and jail large numbers of Pakistani men. This entire multiculturalism in Britain, which has been promoted by the left for a number of decades, has been a failure and has played a significant role in the coverup of the grooming gangs scandal.

When did it start?

In Rotherham, a market town in South Yorkshire, allegedly taxi drivers picked up girls from orphanages or foster homes to take them to places where they were abused. The taxi drivers ‘ names were given to the police and the town council in 2001. &nbsp,

Three years later, a documentary by television’s Channel 4 delved into claims that young white girls in Bradford were being groomed by” Asian” abusers. Law enforcement warned that the documentary would exacerbate racial tensions, so it was put on hold for three months. &nbsp,

This action was one of the first by officialdom to sway the media and stop them from covering the abominable crimes. &nbsp,

Even when genuine investigations finally started, there were only a few token prosecutions, nothing remotely comparable to a thorough effort to eradicate the problem, the abuse, and punish the criminals. The documentary eventually ran, but it produced very little action for at least a decade.

In 2010, five Pakistani men were jailed for offenses against girls as young as 12. &nbsp,

Two years later, the Times of London published a series of articles on the sexual exploitation of girls by grooming gangs. A private 2010 police report that warned that thousands of similar crimes were being committed annually in South Yorkshire by networks of men, the majority of whom were Muslims, was hidden in the copy. &nbsp,

Social workers were allegedly forced into silence and threatened with losing their jobs if they reported rapes, according to reports. Local law enforcement routinely ignored and in some cases even abetted the rapists.

Even worse, senior police officers and others at the top of the totem pole of power purposefully omitted the rapists ‘ attacks, allegedly because they believed this would preserve racial harmony. The inaction was referred to as an extension of” community relations” .&nbsp,

Politicians turned their backs on their parents and loved ones when they begged for assistance. When nonprofit organizations, doctors, and victim advocate groups pushed harder and told what they knew to the press, they, too, were labeled racists and Islamophobic. &nbsp,

” It’s a combination of a lack of police forces together with local authorities, local councils turning a blind eye and then you add to this the failure on the part of much of the British media to cover the horrendous rapes of thousands of young girls”, Gardiner said. There are several actors present who “really failed to do anything.”

How widespread was it?

It is thought that thousands of girls have been raped, abused, passed around, beaten, and occasionally tortured by these grooming organizations throughout the United Kingdom and throughout the country.

The men lured the most vulnerable girls, who were often poor, fatherless, or orphans, with treats such as food, candy, and car rides. Girls were typically introduced to drugs and alcohol by young men in public places like shopping centers or other establishments, such as shopping centers. That was followed by a sexual relationship with one man who ultimately demanded the girl prove her love and loyalty by having sex with his friends. &nbsp,

The girls were then repeatedly raped and pimped out to networks in other cities and ultimately tossed aside after they reached 16, the legal age of consent in the U. K. &nbsp,

There were alarms raised when an investigation into abuse in Rotherham was launched in 2014, but little was done to address the situation. At least 1, 400 children, some as young as 11, were found to have been groomed for sexual exploitation and trafficking between 1997 and 2013.

Local authorities were aware of the abuse at work but ignored it, according to the report. Some police officers called the underaged girls “tarts” and referred to their rapes as a “lifestyle choice” .&nbsp,

Similar gangs were also active in at least 50 cities in England, according to the report. &nbsp,

Only 61 convictions have been secured as of January 2025, more than 20 years since the first allegations were made, despite the fact that, according to some estimates, one in every seven ethnic Pakistani men in some towns were involved in the rape industry.

Was it for the votes?

One of the more unsettling claims made by politicians is that their party leaders instructed them to keep quiet about the identities of the rapists and traffickers. &nbsp,

Former Labour MP Simon Danczuk told GBN,” It surprised me more than anything that senior politicians told me not to mention the ethnicity or religious bias of those perpetrators.” ” They said it would affect the Labour vote. It was very clear. They were quite clear about it”.

Danczuk, who served in Rochdale as a member of parliament from 2010 to 2017, identified former Parliamentary Labour Party leader Tony Lloyd as one of the people who instructed him to “push the brakes” and not reveal the ethnicity of the suspects. &nbsp,

Danczuk claims that Lloyd was not the only person who prioritized victim over party or personal goals. &nbsp,

Gardiner claimed to the Washington Examiner that some politicians in some parts of Britain rely on the votes of Pakistanis to keep in power.

” You have local political leaders in a number of northern towns who turned a blind eye to what was happening because they did not want to offend immigrant communities and in some cases relied upon Pakistani immigrants for votes”, he said. &nbsp,

How many official inquiries?

10 official inquiries have been made into the grooming gangs in total.

The first was in 2013. In a report released by the Home Affairs Select Committee, the jury faulted police, social workers, and Crown Prosecution Service prosecutors for failing to protect victims. &nbsp,

The following occurred in 2014. Following that inquiry, then-Home Secretary ( and future prime minister ) Theresa May commissioned the Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse in England and Wales. Alexis Jay, a professor, was appointed chairwoman. &nbsp,

A West Midlands Police report from 2010 was reluctantly made public in 2015 following a Freedom of Information request. It showed that law enforcement officials knew about grooming gangs and the targeting of children outside schools but worried that allowing the facts to be known would inflame racial tensions. Nearly 500 children were sexually abused or in danger of being abused, according to the report.

That same year, a review by Oxfordshire Safeguarding Children’s Partnership found 373 children could have been sexually exploited and blamed the Thames Valley Police of not believing victims when they came forward t tell their stories. &nbsp,

Fast-forward several years to a 2022 report by Jay, who had also led the 2014 Rotherham inquiry, that found child sexual exploitation had remained a major problem across the U. K. even after several incidences had been exposed. The Conservative government of the time made only a few of the 20 recommendations for protecting vulnerable children, despite the report’s 20. &nbsp,

The report revealed that police in Telford called some areas of the town “no-go” areas and faulted them for favoritizing the Pakistani community. The inquiry found that” there was a nervousness about race … bordering on a reluctance to investigate crimes committed by what was described as the’ Asian’ community” .&nbsp,

Racial integration in the UK

The grooming scandal is most combustible because of its mix of racial, cultural, and religious differences and sensitivities that allowed immigrant communities a free pass to prey on the native white population. A massive and depraved network of crime, according to reports, was made possible by official cowardice and political correctness.

When India was split into two countries in August 1947, many Indian and Pakistani immigrants moved to the U. K. in search of jobs and other opportunities. The largest of the South Asian immigrant groups to Britain were the Pakistanis. Unlike Indians who had assimilated into British culture, Pakistani Muslims held on to theirs, sometimes policing their communities and applying sharia, the Islamic legal system wholly alien and apart from the British legal system.

According to Gardiner, “local authorities in some parts of Britain have permitted sharia councils and sharia courts to operate.” ” So in some parts of Britain, there is a dual justice system with Muslim communities facing the jurisdiction of sharia courts, which, of course, have no legal basis in Britain, but they are allowed to operate in some parts of the country. Because of the lack of British policing in some areas, this development is very dangerous. There is a lack of law enforcement that has taken place and you have sharia courts operating often openly and applying Islamic law instead of British” .&nbsp,

What is two-tier law enforcement and justice?

Two-tier policing or justice is the belief that police have failed to protect white people from crimes committed by immigrants out of fear they will be labeled racist.

Believers in two-tier policing claim that if the crimes had been committed by white men, they would have faced harsh punishment because of the race of the perpetrators and that assaults, in this case by grooming gangs, were tolerated or allowed to end quickly.

Opinion formers on the Right have raised awareness that crimes against whites aren’t being taken as seriously as those against minorities.

While others like Musk have taken to social media to amplify it, Nigel Farage, the leader of Reform UK, a populist conservative party, has spoken about two-tier policing. &nbsp,

What will come next?

Gardiner believes the only way things will get better is if there is a political overhaul in the next general election, slated four years from now. &nbsp,

” I predict there will be a landslide for the political right in Britain, which will be a combination of the Conservative Party and the Reform Party and I think the socialists will be thrown out of office because they are hugely unpopular”, he said, adding that he expects there to be a “whole rejection of multiculturalism ideology and policies”.

Musk, a close ally of Donald Trump’s electorate, has demanded on his social media platform that British Prime Minister Keir Starmer step down, claiming that he was” complicit in the rape of Britain.”

Starmer was the director of public prosecutions and head of the Crown Prosecution Service between 2008 and 2013. The CPS is a private organization that handles criminal cases. After law enforcement investigates a crime, the CPS decides whether to prosecute. The CPS and, consequently, Starmer have been criticized for failing to resolve a case involving a grooming gang brought to its attention from Rochdale, alleging that the main victim was “unreliable.” In 2011, Nazir Afzal, who was appointed by Starmer as a chief prosecutor, reversed the decision and chose to prosecute.

Starmer called the rape scandal “utterly sick” and claimed too many victims had been let down by “perverse ideas about community relations or by the idea that institutions must be protected before all else” during a press conference on January 6.

He also pushed back on Musk’s claims that he was complicit, saying that when he was chief prosecutor he had tackled the issue “head on” and added that by the time he left office and entered politics in 2015, his office had” the highest number of child sexual abuse cases being prosecuted on record” .&nbsp,

However, Jay’s analysis of the Rotherham cases criticized the CPS and claimed that local law enforcement frequently cited the CPS as being unwilling to pursue charges against the perpetrators.

A 2013 report from the Home Affairs Committee faulted the CPS and said that “unlike many other official agencies implicated in this issue”, the CPS “readily admitted that victims had been let down by them and have attempted both to discover the cause of this systemic failure to improve the way things are done so as to avoid a repetition of such events” .&nbsp,

In the same article, Starmer was praised for “insuring the treatment of victims of sexual assault within the criminal justice system throughout his tenure as Director of Public Prosecution.”

Musk also took aim at Jess Phillips, Britain’s safeguarding minister, calling her a “rape genocide apologist” and a “witch” who “deserves to be in prison” .&nbsp,

Phillips described his assertions as “ridiculous.”

Phillips had turned down a request for a national inquiry into the grooming gang scandal, arguing that local inquiries were more effective in implementing change. However, she stated to Sky News that “nothing is off the table.”

” If the victims come forward to me in this victims panel and they say,’ Sctually, we think there needs to be a national inquiry into this,’ I’ll listen to them”, she said.

Even though victims ‘ groups had previously stated that they “do not want to see a national inquiry,” a Starmer spokesman maintained that he was “open-minded” on the subject. &nbsp,

What lessons can the UK scandal teach America?

” The biggest lesson is do not pursue European-style multiculturalism”, Gardiner said. There is only one culture in existence in America, and that is American culture. Once you start allowing multiple cultures to hold sway this leads to scandals like the grooming scandal whereby society does nothing about mass rapes by Pakistani gangs”.

He also reaffirmed the need to” control the borders” by stating that allowing sharia law and courts to operate would cause” society collapse.”

” You’ve got vast numbers of people in Britain that shouldn’t be there in the first place”, he said. To be honest, it has contributed to the rise of widespread criminal activity in some British cities. The United States has got to secure its borders, has to control who comes into the country, and has to deport foreign criminals — get them out” .&nbsp,

WASHINGTON EXAMINER CLICK HERE TO READ MORE.

Gardiner said that foreign nationals in the U. K. often don’t face deportation. &nbsp,

” United States has a lot more power to deport, and they should do it”, he said. &nbsp,