Lawfare professional Jack Smith’s assertion that President-elect Donald Trump would have been found guilty in the Jan. 6 event if he lost re-election was consistent with regime messaging on Tuesday led to the propaganda press acting appropriately.
Smith, the former special counsel accused of using the justice system to extort Trump, released his statement on the Jan. 6 trial, which was meant to memorize nonsense about the fraudulent case.
” The Department’s see that the Constitution prohibits the continued prosecution and prosecution of a President is unambiguous and does not turn on the weight of the acts charged, the strength of the President’s evidence, or the qualities of the trial, which the Office stands completely behind”, he wrote. ” However, but for Mr. Trump’s election and immediate return to the Presidency, the Office assessed that the accepted facts was sufficient to obtain and maintain a faith at test”.
That’s all she wrote, as far as the happy reporters in business advertising were concerned. All they had to do was skip to the last article to discover what Smith wanted them to read about was what Smith made it simple for them to learn. And they did, day, and time, and time again.
The fact that it is basically a job necessity for any prosecutor to feel their case may be successful is what may be most disconcerting about how the media conducted itself. In addition, there would be important questions as to why the case was brought in the first place. Despite the fact that there was never any confirmation in the case, the media viewed Smith’s compulsion to believe in a successful trial as proof that Trump was blatantly criminal.
That is similar to saying that a person has committed crime because a district attorney brought the charge against them, so there is no need for a test.
The liberal media wants to get one last shot at their beloved Jack’s research and make a few more huffs and breaths to get over Smith for a upcoming source job and/or interview. Between all the liberal networks and book publishers, it’ll be a cat-fight for his services”, Curtis Houck, managing editor of News Busters, told The Federalist. According to the Mueller investigation and their obsession with his guide assault dog Andrew Weissmann, some liberals on MSNBC and the left blogosphere will continue to view Smith as nearly romantic.
Smith also included other self-aggrandizing statements, which allowed the media’s liars to proceed to portray him as the hero of the republic.
The record is expected to be the ultimate Justice Department record of a dark chapter in British history, which threatened to stymie the peaceful transfer of power, a rock of politics for centuries, and complements now released indictments and reports, according to Special Counsel Jack Smith, who stated that his team” stood up the rule of law.”
Politics and the peaceful transfer of power were always near to being threatened, and Smith himself laid that out in the document when he detailed how Jan. 6 was never an “insurrection”, as the media often claimed.
The document allowed NPR, NBC, The Washington Post, and many more to address Trump’s re-election as a mere formality standing in the way of a sure-fire faith. Uprising? Also, that couldn’t be proven on a formality, too. Smith claimed that the statute was very recent.
According to Trump,” Deranged Jack Smith ended up writing yet another” Report” based on information that the Unselect Committee of Political Hacks and Thugs ILLEGALLY DESTROYED AND DELETED because it demonstrated how completely innocent Nancy Pelosi, and others, were,” he said on social media after the report was made public. ” Jack is a lamebrain attorney who was unable to find his case tried before the vote.”
Breccan F. Thies is an votes journalist for The Federalist. He formerly covered issues of culture and education for Breitbart News and the Washington Examiner. He is a 2022 Claremont Institute Publius Fellow and holds a degree from the University of Virginia. You may pursue him on X: @BreccanFThies.
