On Friday night, Pete Hegseth was eventually confirmed as the defence minister, but not before Democrats and their RINO friends made their best efforts to thwart his assurance by removing the outdated legal precedent they had used against Justice Brett Kavanaugh.
Advertisement
As PJ Media reported earlier this year, a suitable eleventh-hour claim emerged from Danielle Hegseth Dietrich, the ex-wife of our fresh Secretary of Defense’s nephew, who claimed that Pete Hegseth had abused his former partner, Samantha Deering. According to Danielle Dietrich’s uncertain oath, Deering reportedly “feared for her existence”, and was forced to hide in a drawer to leave Hegseth’s supposed indignation.
There was only one minor issue with this last-ditch attempt to discredit Hegseth’s confirmation: Deering herself swiftly acknowledged her position, not merely denying the allegations but also intimidating legal action.  ,
” First and foremost, I have not and will not reply on my relationship to Pete Hegseth. I do not have representatives speaking on my behalf, nor have I ever asked people to communicate or talk about the details of my wedding on my representative, whether it be a writer, a council member, a transition team member, etc. “, she told NBC News, which reported on the claims. ” I do not feel your knowledge to be correct, and I have cc’d my attorney”.
Samantha’s neglect fast rendered Danielle’s charges redundant because the only two persons who can say for certain what transpired in Pete Hegseth’s relationship to Samantha Deering are Pete Hegseth and Samantha Deering. Had Samantha corroborated the charges, it would have good ended all possibility of Pete Hegseth’s assurance.
Recommended: What? Trump Hasn’t Fixed Four Times Of Biden’s Messes In Four Time?
Advertisement
So the problem you must ask is why Danielle Dietrich signed an oath saying that such a thing occurred when it is obvious that it did not.
After the validation voting, Danielle Dietrich released the following speech, which seems to keep the answer:
There was a lot of discussion about the fact that the numerous and rudimentary charges against Pete Hegseth may be easily disregarded because they were private. People are reluctant to come forward and tell the truth about a strong man like him for a number of reasons. A week ago, I was promised that my speech, on the report, would confirm the various charges and make a difference in important seats. But in the close, it did not. Because the men involved in the decisions leading to Hegseth’s assurance have deliberately perpetuated the mechanisms that keep women motionless, including joke orders and fear of retaliation, what happened today may make women who have experienced mistreatment and mistreatment yet more less timely. ]emphasis added]
Danielle Dietrich was therefore “promised” for making a false statement on record.
Well, well, well, that’s certainly interesting. In exchange for her statement, who was it that promised her something? In all likelihood, it was U. S. Senator Jack Reed (D-R. I. The Senate Armed Services Committee’s Ranking Member, who requested the affidavit in the first place before signing and swearing under the law of perjury, was among the others.
Advertisement
According to Hegseth’s legal team, Dietrich is not only a a “far left Democrat”, but also had an” axe to grind” with the Hegseth family.
Sam has never made allegations of abuse, but she recently confirmed that she had done so in a recent FBI interview and signed court documents confirming this. Belated claims by Danielle Dietrich, an anti-Trump far-left Democrat who is divorced from Mr. Hegseth’s brother and never got along with the Hegseth family, do nothing to change that”, one of Pete Hegseth’s lawyers told NBC News.
” After an acrimonious divorce, Ms. Dietrich has had an axe to grind against the entire Hegseth family”, he added. ” Ms. Dietrich admits that she saw nothing, but she is now falsely accusing Sam of lying to both the Court and the FBI because of allegedly making private, undocumented statements ten years ago,” Dietrich said.
Did Senate Democrats reach out to Danielle Dietrich and offer her a reward for her affidavit? We may have a serious scandal on our hands thanks to Christine Blasey Ford’s fabricated allegations against Brett Kavanaugh, and this all reeks of the same shenanigans Democrats pulled.
