Tulsi Gabbard, President Donald Trump’s candidate for director of national intelligence, is the subject of a significant status press release. The item is allegedly based on NSA monitoring of two unidentified terrorists.
Previous Democrat congresswoman from Hawaii, Hassan Nasrallah, and Gabbard, both of whom are close to the situation, will be accused of meeting during a 2017 Middle East journey with Hassan Nasrallah, according to two people with knowledge of the situation. Two weeks before a Senate Intelligence Committee confirmation hearing, the paper is expected to publish the” all the information that’s fit for printing” deep position smear against Gabbard on Tuesday afternoon.
One of the most ridiculous allegations against a serving part of the U.S. war, I have always heard, according to Bernard Hudson, who was the CIA’s director of cybersecurity in 2016 and 2017.
” It isolates faith at every level”, Hudson told The Federalist.
According to Dave Reaboi, a national security analyst and brother at the Claremont Institute,” This is the kind of affordable skullduggery for which the Deep State has become infamous with the American people.” We give these people” a lot of strength” to run their businesses in the dark and keep our secrets, assuming they are professionals who are dedicated to protecting our country’s protection. Instead, many of the top leaders of the IC have harmed the trust we gave them by putting their skills to the test by making a war with their local political opponents.
Reaboi argued that” I want to see the internet and Senate Democrats go after Hezbollah with third as much poison as they’ve been directing toward Tulsi Gabbard.” This piece of hearsay from two terrorists, or” this piece of brains,” was not taken seriously for ten years.
Even as the original DNC vice chair pursued her group’s presidential election in 2020, Gabbard’s alleged secret conference with one of the Middle East’s most dangerous terrorists nearly ten years ago had never been revealed.
Following Republican senators ‘ anonymous complaints to Semafor about the nominee’s 2017 conference with then-Syrian government head Bashar al-Assad, which was approved by a House ethics board, The New York Times ‘ planned hit intended to prevent Gabbard’s confirmation to move the intelligence community. Before the Senate overwhelmingly approved his election to guide the State Department in 2013, former Secretary of State John Kerry even had a meeting with Assad.
Private GOP senators expressed concern over Gabbard’s prior criticism of heavy state spy operations that had been used to investigate Trump’s first presidential campaign last week. The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act ( FISA ) was amended while Gabbard and Republican Rep. Thomas Massie of Kentucky, both while she was in Congress.
Gabbard, a nearly , two-decade veteran, a lieutenant colonel in the Army Reserve, and a long-time critique of America’s forever wars, is no stranger to heavy state interference. The former Democratic presidential candidate was the rveillance-state/”>subject of rveillance-state/”>surveillance by the United States ‘ Federal Air Marshals Service ( FAMS ) last year. According to a text from the journalist watchdog organization Empower Oversight, Gambard was targeted “one day after she criticized the Biden Administration” on Fox News.
Difficulty ex-intelligence leaders wrote a letter to the Senate Intelligence Committee this week recommending her assurance despite the fact that Gabbard has been the subject of heavy state smear campaigns that have been published in reputation media outlets.
” As former lovers, experts, customers, and drivers of intellect, we support Lt. Col. Tulsi Gabbard to guide the IC”, they wrote, according to Fox News. ” She has the dignity, and moral fortitude, to restore honesty and professionalism to the world’s brains agencies”.
Sens. According to The Hill, Susan Collins of Maine and Todd Young of Indiana are the only Republican jump vote on the council where Gabbard cannot afford to lose.