Second Lady Melania Trump’s dress and look in her formal White House portrait were attacked in an article published by Vogue a few days ago. According to author Hannah Jackson, Melania doesn’t appear to be a public servant, but instead appears to be a freelance sorcerer in her suit. In the established picture, Melania should have posed for a blouse or blazer, Jackson claimed, but she thought the latter was preferable.
Trump appeared to be playing the role of the first lady of the United States in a photo taken by French artist Régine Mahaux, referring to the dark Dolce &, Gabbana tuxedo coat, white button-up, and Ralph Lauren cardigan Melania wore.
Trump appeared more like a independent magic than a public servant, according to the article.
The author said Melania apparently refused to “abandon drama” for the photograph since she lived in a “gold-encrusted tower” and her renown is” so entangled with a reality-television kingdom”.
The Trumps are displaying success this moment, while the painting is more subdued, through the group of tech Executives who sat in the front row at the 2025 opening, whose combined net worth was over a trillion money.
Although some social media users called the black and white photo of Melania “heavily photoshopped,” Vogue’s harsh criticism of her has a environment. In her first year as First Lady, Vogue did not include Melania in a cover story, reversing a long-standing practice for Jill Biden because Jill was featured on Vogue include months before the vote.
Melania Trump had previously reacted when Vogue suggested that she shouldn’t have had her on the handle. ” They’re biased and they have likes and dislikes, and it’s so apparent”, she had said. And I believe that everyone in America sees it. I had to make their choice, and I have much more essential things to do than work in Vogue, which I did.
Vogue slammed, social media users share author Hannah Jackson’s image asking if she can condemn anyone’s style choice
On Vogue’s X blog, people called the newspaper trivial. Your opinions are trash and solely based on politics, and she’s gorgeous and scarcely misses when it comes to fashion. Pathetic”, one wrote. One person shared the image of author Hannah Jackson and questioned whether she should be giving people fashion tips. Your opinions are trash and solely based on politics, and she’s stunning and often misses when it comes to fashion. Pathetic”, another wrote.
