ANALYSIS: Two self-described progressive scholars who study race and class have a better way to explain crucial sexism and prejudice.
Some people are” convictors” and others are “acquitters” when it comes to determining whether racism or sexism occurred.
That is the thesis of” Is it racist? Is it discriminatory”?, a new book out presently from Stanford University Press.
Professors Betsy Leondar-Wright and Jessi Streib observe the opinions of light conservatives and liberals in the book.
They determine that conservatives are typically “acquitters”, when it comes to claims of racism and sexism. In other words, they typically assume that a person is innocent until proven otherwise. Democrats tend to be convictors, ready to believe charges of racism and sexism.
Although Streib and Leondar-Wright both claim their political views are “left” and point out that democratic news outlets are their sources of information, the pair has a more effective way to discuss these issues. People may be” auditors”, they write, “focused on taking careful steps of the environment and working to improve it”.
The guide is usually easy to read, relying on tales, comments from folks interviewed, and entertaining fact-check notes. There are too many complicated links to data and studies in this educational work.
The writers do a great job of capturing some of the causes behind people’s prejudices against race and gender. They even record the viewpoints of those who describe how they influenced their decisions.
Additionally, the authors did not attempt to adapt their findings to meet their beliefs by beginning with a dissertation. Instead, they developed their nomenclature and opinions after conducting the interviews.
They also make use of current events and genuine scenarios to illustrate how people deal with pressing issues.
The authors usually address liberal and conservative people in kind ways, pointing out flaws without making any accusations against them. Even though I definitely don’t share some political views with the authors, I can see why they would be generally good to sit down with and talk about current events.
The publication does seem like it would be most beneficial to a democratic audience. In my opinion, it would be a great book for college students to read either at the beginning of the year or following a contentious campus incident. Despite what the authors said, they “hope that users across the political spectrum will join with the guide and find it useful.” Additionally, they added that “everyone can change the way they approach circumstances where racism and sexism may or may not arise”
There are some points I would have handled separately. For instance, the book discusses females in spiritual authority and abortion as potential sexism. These viewpoints are deeply rooted in moral and religious principles, and they are more challenging than accepting the notion that a female doctor is a nurse ( an illustration provided in the book ).
Additionally, I believe the book may have spent more time examining the potential harms of erroneously indicting a racist. Just one Latino girl was falsely accused of racism in the book because she demanded money from dark clients. However, the true harms may include fire and ostracization and class punishment.
The authors, on the other hand, suggest that their studying technique can help identify unbalanced treatment situations. I inquired about the instances of black Americans being denied debts in the book because they frequently had lower credit scores.
When prospective clients and actual clients of various races have the same credit scores and are applying for the same types of loans, they said, “in this case, we may analyze whether banks treat prospective clients and actual clients of various races separately.” We might also consider whether credit scores are a result of disparate treatment, as is the case with the many procedures that have made it hard for black families to establish credit.
This guide both accurately explains the problem at hand and specifies the terminology used.
It’s a good place to start a legal discussion, even if some visitors may disagree with how the professors identify racism and sexism.
Users of the book will have another method to determine whether a particular line is racist or sexist.
Further: Oberlin College ‘ Jews and Power ‘ program questioned by priest
Photo: Stanford University Press
Follow The College Fix on Twitter and Like us on Instagram.
