There have been numerous appropriate arguments made for why the United States should leave the UN, including the deterioration of American independence, climate activism that threatens the world economy, and billions of dollars spent on non-U.S. activities. S. interests, and forced engagement with brutal rulers. Five lesser-known reasons to leave the UN that might be even more convincing to the typical family are listed below.
1. The UN is the most important international source of gender identity research.
In the name of “ href=”https://www.dailysignal.com/2021/01/27/the-dark-side-of-global-gender-equality/” target=”_blank” rel=”noreferrer noopener”>gender equality,” the UN is a significant player in the global drive to de-sex world. UN Women convened a five-year motion plan to achieve their type of female equality in 2021, which the href=”https://forum.generationequality.org/” target=”_blank” rel=”noreferrer noopener”>Generation Equality Forum established. To promote href=”https://www.dailysignal.com/2021/01/27/the-dark-side-of-global-gender-equality/” target=”_blank” rel=”noreferrer noopener”>gender equality on a global scale, the Forum received$ 40 billion in financial agreements.  ,
UN Women has a history of supporting children’s right worldwide. But in July 2019,  , UN Women announced , it may now focus on “equality of all genders” including transgender, questioning or gay, trans, pan-sexual, gender nonbinary, intersex, and” the whole range of gender diversities that exist”. This significant change by UN Women demonstrates the withdrawal of children’s rights at the highest UN rates. It signals the attempted , destruction of natural sex , as a significant and reasonable designation in community.
The work of the United Nations has a major role in the amazing and almost inexplicable rise in trans activism and the costs of kids and others identifying as transgender over the past five decades.
2. UN Agencies Promote ‘ Sexual Rights’ for Babies
Comprehensive sexuality education courses are a significant way that the UN aims to spread female philosophy across the globe. These programs not only teach children that their bodies do not reveal their innate identities as male or female, but they also teach them that they have” physical right” that must be protected by the law. These” sexual rights” include the right to access sexual content and the right to sexual pleasure for people of all ages ( see here and here ). UN stars fight vigorously to make complete sexuality education a mortal right in UN negotiations.
The UN’s comprehensive record on sexuality education, which has been endorsed by numerous UN organizations, including the World Health Organization, contains numerous references to childhood sexuality. It says,” ]Young ] people want and need sexuality and sexual health information as early and comprehensively as possible”, that children should have “agency in their own sexual practices and relationships”, and that comprehensive sexuality education can “help children…form respectful and healthy relationships with…sexual partners”.
International Planned Parenthood Federation, a long-time lover of UN organizations, is the biggest advocate for comprehensive sexuality training programs in the world. According to its” physical right” pronouncement for youth,” Gender and sexual enjoyment are important aspects of being human for anyone, no matter what time, no matter if you’re married or not, and no matter if you want to have kids or no.” See the word” no matter what age”, which does not appear to make exceptions for babies, toddlers, or children. ( For more on the children’s sexual rights movement, see here and here. )
3. The UN has a Record of Horrific Child Sex Abuse
UN staff and UN troops have reported child sex abuse cases for ages ( see here and here ). A series of “food-for-sex” crises erupted in the early 2000s when UN peacekeepers in Liberia were accused of selling meals for sex to women as young as eight, to name just a few of the many terrible occurrences. At least 134 UN troops from Sri Lanka were charged with sexually abusing kids in a sexual circle in Haiti between 2004 and 2007. One child reported having intercourse with more than 100 troops, which he reportedly did four a day for the first three years, when the boy was fifteen.
In 2014 in the Central African Republic, another child sex controversy erupted involving European UN peacekeepers. One boy said he’d been given biscuits and cash in exchange for sex and a thirteen-year-old boy said he” couldn’t number all the times he’d been forced to perform]sex acts ] on soldiers”. Top UN officials suspended a senior UN official for “breaching methods” when one UN established informed French authorities of the alleged abuse of children. There are numerous other disturbing and lengthy incidents, and little has been done to stop them.
In a last breath, UNICEF’s Application Book for the Agreement on the Rights of the Child apparently instructs politicians around the world on how to protect the rights and well-being of kids. The creator of the book was lifelong children ‘s-rights advocate Peter Newell, who worked for UNICEF. According to reports, Newell allegedly raped a son when the child was 13 years old when she was convicted of sexual acts in February 2018. Newell pleaded guilty to the charges brought against him. Allow that become apparent. A baby murderer wrote the UN book on baby protection around the world. ( See here for more on the perplexing impact of the Convention on the Rights of the Child. )
4. UN Officers are Immune to Prosecution
According to a foundation UN report, the Agreement on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN, UN officials are “absolutely immune from legal process in respect of all words spoken or written and all acts performed by them in their formal capacity,” and this immunity extends to civil lawsuits in any country and jurisdiction.
This means that UN officials are exempt from prosecution for almost any crime that might be related to their “official capacity.” Former UN investigator Peter Gallo claims that the immunity loophole is “being grossly abused” and that UN officials are “paid enormous salaries for what they do and they’re comfortable in their immunity knowing they won’t be caught.”
I always come to mind the adage, “absolute power corrupts.”
5. The Current Secretary-General of the UN is the Former President of Socialist International
The UN’s very foundations are buried in the list of UN leaders who have socialist and communist ties. However, one doesn’t have to dig deep into the muddle of UN history to find that the UN has strong socialist tendencies. António Guterres, current Secretary-General of the UN is a member of the Portuguese Socialist Party and served as secretary-general of the Socialist Party from 1992-2002. From 1999 to 2005, he then held the office of president of Socialist International.
Further, Audrey Azoulay, the current director-general of the United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization ( UNESCO ) is a member of the Socialist Party. This is important because UNESCO is the self-appointed protector of education for the world and has an increasing amount of influence over how the world’s children will be taught in the upcoming decade. Do you believe that Ms. Azoulay and Mr. Guterres want children to learn about Mao’s socialist-communist state’s dark and lethal history? Or the millions upon millions smashed into Marxist Russia’s wheels? Or the legions killed in Cambodia’s ruthless regime?
The Time is Ripe
The UN’s combination of little accountability, enormous financial reserves, a love affair with child sex, and ever-increasing political leverage has had a negative impact on children and families around the world and poses a threat to do even worse.
In 1984, President Ronald Reagan withdrew the United States from the Organization for Economic Cooperation, claiming that it had “exhibited hostility toward the fundamental institutions of a free society, particularly a free press and a free market, and had unrestrained budgetary expansion. ” President George W. Bush re-enter the conversation.” During his first term in office, President Trump withdrew the United States from both the World Health Organization and UNESCO. once more from the World Health Organization.
Is it time to completely remove the United States from the UN? The first president in history to have the will to do so is President Trump. But will he?
Let’s hope so. Our children’s future may depend on it.
