Chuck Schumer Might Legally Reap the ‘Whirlwind’ for His Threats Against Supreme Court Justices

In March 2020, thick Sen. Chuck Schumer, the New York Democrat, stood on the actions of the U. S. Supreme Court Building at a pro-abortion march and threatened the lives of two Supreme Court justices if they dared shift abortion laws in the U. S. &nbsp,

” You have released the storm, and you will give the price”, Schumer thundered before the pro-abortion group, in what appeared in fact to be an insurrection-y opinion against part of the government. But it got worse. &nbsp,

Two judges who Donald Trump had just been sworn in as magistrates were name-checked by Schumer. &nbsp,

” I want to inform you, Gorsuch! I want to show you, Kavanaugh”! Schumer screeched. Upping the ante of his speech before the unhappy crowd—on the actions of the Supreme Court Building—he blustered,” You won’t know what hit you if you go ahead with these terrible selections” .&nbsp,

The Supreme Court was hearing circumstances challenging Roe v. Wade, the state’s current federal abortion laws. Schumer’s danger was intended to steal the president’s and his supporters ‘ predetermined outcome. And people got the message. Violently. Demonstrably. Had Schumer get away with the clear threat that the Supreme Court will give America the “wrong” abortion solution? &nbsp,

When I hear the name Chuck Schumer, “bipartisanship” does not come to mind:

” I want to show you, Gorsuch. I want to inform you, Kavanaugh. You have released the storm, and you will pay the price. You won’t know what hit you if you go ahead with these terrible decisions”. https ://t.co/SxzxR3HB27 photograph. twitter.com/nnGz2aP5tb

— Carrie Severino ( @JCNSeverino ) November 13, 2024

The Democrat party’s remarks were so destructive and ridiculous that Chief Justice John Roberts issued a rare public censure, presciently calling them “inappropriate” and “dangerous”. However, despite making attempts to place them back in the Senate properly, Schumer has chosen not to regret for his remarks.

In fact, Schumer’s deeds in consequence gave the poor performers on his party’s side of the aisle social support and set the stage for even worse things to come. The political standards of politeness were eliminated. Contraception was more crucial than court protection.

On May 2, 2022, an reportedly “unknown” employee at the U. S. Supreme Court leaked the draft version of the Dobbs majority opinion through the&nbsp, USAID paid-for&nbsp, Politico site. The decision thoroughly explained why abortion was a matter for states and not a national right, and not that any pro-abortion supporters argued blatantly that the national abortion “rights” in the United States were built on lies without a legal foundation. Ruth Bader Ginsburg once believed that. &nbsp,

However, pro-abortion activists posted the names of all magistrates ‘ homes on May 4, 2022. The organized crime group” Ruth Sent Us” made plans for protests to be held in front of the magistrates ‘ houses a week later. &nbsp, But Schumer always apologized. However, now he may get held criminally liable for those challenges. &nbsp,

On May 17, 2021, the Supreme Court granted certiorari in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization. &nbsp,

On June 8, 2022, an assassin, armed with a gun, a knife, and a “hit checklist”, was arrested near Justice &nbsp, Kavanaugh’s house. However, “you won’t know what hit you if you go ahead with these terrible choices” were the thoughts left hanging in the air after the enemy’s imprisonment. &nbsp,

And Schumer however refused&nbsp, to forgive and renounce his terrible threats. &nbsp,

I’m glad the culprit was caught, and the Senate passed legislation dealing with the Supreme Court really fast.
Didn’t handle his remark

— Manu Raju ( @mkraju ) June 22, 2022

Schumer has never been held accountable for his assault on another branch of the government, as it has until today. However, everything happened recently that has forced the rebel-backed legislator to step up.

The fresh U. S. lawyer in Washington, D. C., Ed Martin, has sent Schumer a prosecutor letter asking him to answer &nbsp, his concerns about the Senate leader’s” major threats against public authorities. ” Martin’s investigation will examine whether Schumer acted in a way that prohibited the press from intimidating courts and other leaders. Doh. &nbsp,

And here are some of the features of the attorney text: &nbsp,

You made your remarks at a personal protest held outside the U.S. Capitol. &nbsp,

You made them plainly and in a way that many found disturbing. &nbsp,

Your actual words were:” I want to show you Gorsuch. I want to show you Kavanaugh. You’ve made the maelstrom available, and you’ll have to pay the price. If you make these terrible selections, you won’t know what hit you. ” &nbsp,

We take risks against government officials significantly. &nbsp,

I look forward to your participation…

The comments are informative. In an official proceeding, Chuck Schumer’s challenges against Justices Brett Kavanaugh and Neil Gorsuch would still have been incorrect and might have led to an assassination attempt, but they could have been justified under the Speech and Conversation Section. &nbsp,

That’s not what is being alleged below. However, this may not be an old matter, beyond the statute of limitations. It may still be a life matter. &nbsp,

Chuck, lawyer away. &nbsp,

Source credit