An Obama-appointed determine erected a temporary injunction over the weekend to prevent the DOGE from accessing delicate Treasury Department information. The fact appears to be much more extensive than the media’s portrayal of political appointees and unique government employees.  ,
Advertisement
Judge Paul Engelmayer’s decision expressly bars all democratic appointees—including Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent—from Treasury payment information and financial methods, restricting access to career civil servants (essentially the Deep State ) within the Bureau of Fiscal Services. This unprecedented action successfully effectively obstructs the Treasury secretary from managing the financial data in his own department, raising serious questions about the administration’s ability to govern and executive authority.
The Trump administration’s attorneys argued Sunday that the order violates the government’s legal jurisdiction over the executive tree. They contend that a judge’s interference with the government’s ability to oversee his own team and initiatives is a obvious example of judicial overreach.
As Trump put it,” No assess really, simply, be allowed to create that kind of a selection”. His statement highlights a basic concern with regard to the judiciary’s role in governance and the separation of powers.
Rep. Eli Crane (R-Ariz. ) is going one step further and is drafting articles of impeachment against the judge, in addition to the Trump administration’s efforts to combat this lawfare.  ,
In a blog on X, Crane stated,” I’m drafting articles of impeachment for US District Judge Paul Engelmayer. A danger to democracy is a result of political courts ‘ abuse of their jobs.
Advertisement
” This is certainly criminal overreach”, Crane continued. Judge Engelmayer is attempting to prevent White House staff from gaining access to the systems they control. Where does the law state that a President and his team are unable to eliminate unwarranted waste, fraud, and misuse?
This is certainly administrative excess.
Judge Engelmayer is attempting to prevent White House people from having access to the systems they control.
Where does the law state that a President and his team can’t eliminate unwarranted waste, scams, and abuse?
— Rep. Eli Crane ( @RepEliCrane ) February 11, 2025
Engelmayer’s judgement wasn’t really absurd—it was a blatant power grab. The extremely anti-Trump New York Attorney General Letitia James, one of the 19 communist state attorneys general in this petition, claims that giving DOGE members admittance to Treasury data violates the separation of powers under the Constitution. It’s a absurd explanation, but that was never the place.  ,
All these communist attorneys standard had to do was pitch their legal arguments to a friendly anti-Trump judge, who was able to halt their attempts to impede the management, which they did. We have a problem that urgently needs to be fixed when judges choose to disregard the Constitution and issue clearly political decisions without any legal or constitutional foundation, and senate is a means to do so.  ,
Advertisement
The House and Senate must take actions in the same way that a federal prosecutor is required to impeach a president, which is similar to that process. It begins with an inspection, usually led by the House Judiciary Committee, into allegations of wrongdoing such as crime, corruption, or another high crimes and misdemeanors. The situation moves to the Senate for a test if the House votes to impeach with a basic lot. A two-thirds bulk of the Senate’s votes are required for conviction and removal from office, which means a Senate conviction would be doubtful even though the Republican-controlled House does impeach him. While 15 national courts have been impeached in U. S. story, just eight have been removed, making it a unique but effective tool to keep the court responsible.  ,
