The latest Ivy League institution to install a guide that asks school officials to refrain from speaking out on the contentious political and social issues of the day was recently released by Dartmouth College, which is known as the” Institutional Restraint Policy.”
In Dartmouth’s situation, its new plan replaced its past” Institutional Claims vs Individual Statements Plan” that had been engaged since 2022.
Of the eight Ivy Leagues, Harvard, Yale, Cornell, University of Pennsylvania, and presently Dartmouth have then implemented plans” committing to the rules of administrative neutrality”, according to Heterodox Academy.
A list of 119 educational institutions that have adopted these rules in recent years is maintained by the club. Based on the legendary University of Chicago record from 1967, the Kalven report, which outlines how universities should maintain their political and social neutrality.
Dartmouth adopted a slightly different technique than the majority of colleges, which calls their statements “institutional neutrality.”
The administrators made an purposeful distinction between “institutional caution” and “institutional neutrality,” as the name implies that colleges” should not have positions on social and political issues,” according to the Dartmouth pupil newspaper.
” We chose the phrase ‘ restriction’ consciously”, Dartmouth’s Committee on Institutional Statements head and Professor John Carey told the store. We want to make it very clear that the organisation is committed to advanceing and supports important principles.
When faced with circumstances directly related to the school’s vision, school officials may “reaffirm Dartmouth’s primary values”, the administrative restraint policy states.
College officials also reiterated their commitment to the development of an open-forum society and to free talk in it.
” To give space for different perspectives to be raised and fully considered, Dartmouth should practice general caution in issuing administrative statements”, the statement continued.
Sian Leah Beilock, president of Dartmouth, wrote in a Wall Street Journal article that “only when institutional independence and caution are embedded in American higher education will it be possible for schools to get real havens of constructive speech and free investigation.”
On January 6, Beilock addressed the new plan in a campuswide message, a version of which was made available to The Fix. The president acknowledged that while many would have questions or even disagree with the policy, the complaints would be “exactly]the ] … kind of dissent]that ] … the committee set out to protect”.
” This is how we preserve a learning environment where the best tips prevail”, Beilock wrote, continuing on to guide the University of Chicago’s 1967 Kalven record.
The report asserts that” the school is the home and partner of reviewers, it is not itself the critic” and is well-known in the scientific community.
Heterodox Academy, Academic Freedom Alliance, and the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression are all strong supporters of this document as a model for colleges to follow.
In an email to The Fix, FIRE’s Senior Program Officer Ryan Ansloan expressed his wish that more schools across the nation will pursue Dartmouth’s example. ” As we’ve written before: language aside, the idea is clear: institutions should refrain from taking political jobs”.
The concept of administrative independence has received condemnation, however—and from various angles. In The Dartmouth, Professor Carey noted that the word has been” criticized” because it implies that an organisation should not advance a set of beliefs. Additional critics claim that there is not enough room for independence.
” Until deans, department heads, faculty and students embrace intellectual and political diversity, institutional neutrality is no different than virtue-signaling”, San Diego State University English Professor Peter C. Herman wrote in an op-ed for Inside Higher Ed, noting that these policies are sometimes” a hollow gesture”.
” I prefer’ restriction’ over’ independence,'” Herman wrote in an internet to The Fix, noting that the name’ restraint’ reflects compassion, as opposed to professors “going off half-cocked about every issue”.
Herman also commended the new policy for its thorough approach, as Dartmouth’s restraint policy will apply not only to the dean, but also to “departments, programs, centers, and institutes”, the official statement reads.
Professor Carey and the media relations department at Dartmouth did not respond to The College Fix, but rather pointed to publicly available documents.
Follow The College Fix on Twitter and Like us on Facebook.
