UnitedHealth Group has agreed to pay at least$ 20.25 million to settle a U. S. Department of Labor lawsuit that alleged a division of the company, called UMR, wrongly denied thousands of promises to pay health care providers for emergency room service and urinary drug checks.
The suggested consent order and view, which was filed Friday in the U. S. District Court of Western Wisconsin, calls on UMR to charge out-of-pocket prices that people incurred when insurance was denied.
In July 2023, the federal government alleged UMR, which administers health plans for large employers, should have applied a medical necessity standard to claims for urinary drug screening but instead “applied no standard and simply denied all the claims”, according to the original complaint from the U. S. Department of Labor ( DOL ).
The complaint also alleged UMR didn’t use the appropriate regular when deciding whether to pay for specific ER statements.
” This lawsuit involves administrative procedures that are no longer in place”, UnitedHealth Group said in a statement. ” We have been in continuous agreements with the DOL and have now reached a decision that we believe is in the best interest of the programs and students that we support”.
Eden Prairie-based UnitedHealth Group is parent organization to United Healthcare, which is the nation’s largest health insurer.
UMR is part of the insurance company, managing health programs for self-insured companies who hire the firm as a third-party superintendent, processing claims and managing a system of health care providers. The U. S. Department of Labor regulates self-insured wellness programs.
Promises were denied for at least 2, 136 self-funded health strategies, the , Labor Department said when the lawsuit was filed. It sought insurance to plan members whose claims were denied poorly by UMR from January 2015 to the day of the registration.
The U. S. Department of Labor’s lawsuit, along with a separate issue from people later in 2023 about the business ‘s , alleged use of artificial intelligence , in denying says, raised claims similar to those amplified in , public discussion over the health insurance market  , since the Dec. 4 crime of UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson.
Under the proposed consent order filed Friday, UMR will reprocess emergency room and urinary drug screening claims, offering payment to patients of$ 68.85 to$ 103.27 for the UDS claims and up to$ 353.22 per ER claim.
The company will also pay a penalty equal to 10 % of the total payments issued under the proposed consent order.
“UMR agrees that the court should enter the consent order and judgment, and therefore does not oppose the acting secretary’s motion”, wrote attorneys for acting Labor Secretary Vincent Micone III. ” However, defendant UMR’s nonopposition to the motion should not be construed as agreement with all statements in the acting secretary’s supporting brief”.
The government alleged that UMR’s procedures for adjudicating emergency room claims relied solely on diagnosis codes and did not comply with the required “prudent layperson” standard when deciding whether to pay for care. This standard asks companies to consider what a person with average knowledge of health and medicine would think is necessary care at the time of symptoms, rather than basing coverage denials solely on a medical provider’s diagnosis at the end of ER treatment.
It was not clear from court filings when a judge in the case might enter a final order and judgment.
___
© 2025 The Minnesota Star Tribune
Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.
