Mussel & nbsp is the charity head of DOGE, a brand-new division created by President Donald Trump. Musk has only been advising the president, according to the White House Office of Administration, and “has no exact or proper authority to make government choices himself.”
” Mr. Musk can only advise the President and connect the President’s commands”, said the director of the Office of Administration, Joshua Fisher, in the filing. ” The U. S. DOGE Service Temporary Organization is within the U. S. DOGE Service. Both are kept distinct from the White House Office. Mr. Musk is an individual in the White House Office. He is not an individual of the U. S. DOGE Service or the U. S. DOGE Service Temporary Organization. Mr. Musk is not the U. S. DOGE Service Administrator”.
Following the complaint against Musk filed by New Mexico, one of the 13 states challenging DOGE’s investigation into federal agencies, this explanation comes as a result. Musk was credited for the determination to shut down the , U. S. Agency for International Development , offices a few weeks ago.
Yet, many of the questions that the attorneys general have posed are related to what DOGE will do next. Despite Expand having only recently opened its investigation into the district’s spending, rumours of demolishing the ministry gained momentum last week during the reading of Secretary of Education candidate Linda McMahon.
At the same time, former and current staff with , USAID are suing , Musk , for wielding” major governmental” control without being nominated to his place.
WASHINGTON EXAMINER CLICK HERE TO READ MORE.
The people cite the Constitution’s Appointments Clause in their match disputing , Musk’s steps, using the same reasoning as the lawyers standard. This section specifies that there are some political activities that are “exercised only by people who are” Soldiers of the United States,” who are confirmed most frequently by the Senate.
Within 24 days of the lawyers general’s testimony on Monday, U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan stated that she intends to act. According to Chutkan, the situation demonstrated the immediate damage that was necessary for a momentary restraining order against Musk, prompting a decision.
