The Washington Post exposed its knowledge of the origins of infants ten years ago. The publication released a report on Wednesday that revealed its writers also don’t know what every 10-year-old learns in a particular conversation with their parents. ( I’d heard the panicked claim that all the money from USAID was needed to fund sex education in uneducated regions of the world was actually Washington newsrooms ) )
In 2014, the Post’s Philip Bump took a scientific assertion that he didn’t enjoy but that everyone understands to be real — that “human living beings at vision” — and tried to contradict it by citing “experts” who said that pregnancy doesn’t start until implantation. The second life is created and the second insertion occurs are not interchangeable, as Federalist Editor-in-Chief Mollie Hemingway explained to the Spots of the time, which probably took two seconds to see right now.
This year, the Post is at it suddenly, with an extremely clear notion of humanity’s intimate existence: the fact that, when you come into the world, you are either male or female.
Once again, Post authors were responding to a clinical fact that even younger children understand, but which is difficult for them socially. Following President Donald Trump’s executive order recognizing” two women, adult and female”, the Post went searching for “experts” and “science” to show him bad.
” Trump says there are’ two gender.’ Researchers and scientific say it’s no binary”, is the title they chose.
Artists Kelsey Ables , and , Mark Johnson solicited the help of “experts” like the University of Iowa’s Maurine Neiman to discuss why sex is “much more challenging than a plain linear”. By the way, Neiman was recently given almost a million dollars by the National Science Foundation to study the physical activities of a New Zealand crab. Your employer’s income money!
Today, unlike D-list Broadway artist Ketanji Brown Jackson, you probably didn’t want the type of “science specialists” to understand the difference between boys and girls. Americans are in agreement that there are only two and only two women, and that’s by a more sizable lot than any other U.S. president has won since citizens became able to choose presidential electors from state legislatures. Which implies that the majority of Americans are smarter than The Washington Post.
Trump, and all those Americans who agree with him, are “oversimplifying” human science, the Post and its researchers say. Ables and Johnson begin with this explanation, which is so illiterate in science and teleology that the editor who made it come to print deserves to always work in the media again:
Sex is commonly understood to be a logo given at birth based on a person’s anatomy, which may or may not correspond to their gender.
Everyone who has ever witnessed another human being will soon realize that intercourse is more than just a text on your birth certificate. It’s not just “assigned” by a physician. Even though anatomy is a pretty constant indicator of it, it’s not just anatomy! It is an eternal fact of our existence, as reflected by our physical anatomy, hormones, and intermediate physical, emotional, and mental characteristics. We can’t change it any more than we can change our genetic parentage. Additionally, we can’t change it by shaving the area of our breasts and penile tissue. Teleologically speaking, a man with amputated legs is still a biped.
The article’s insertion of junk science about gender identity — and the stated concern that Trump’s order is “targeting transgender people” — gives away the game. The Post is on the men’s and women’s sides when it comes to making people believe they are the other sex.
However, the Post pretends its objection is actually about people with chromosomal abnormalities or whose reproductive and sexual organs did not develop properly because letting men use the bathroom with young girls is not a very popular hill to die on.
Boys with Klinefelter syndrome are born with an extra X chromosome, according to the Post. Only one X chromosome accompanies a girl who has Turner syndrome. Some boys are born with a resistance to male hormones, while some girls are born with overactive male hormones, both anomalies that affect anatomical development. Baby chromosomes that don’t match their anatomy or have both ovarian and testicular tissue are extremely uncommon in this type of birth. However, these uncommon cases affect far less than the” close to 2 percent of the U.S. population,” for whom the Post’s experts say sex is difficult to “assign.”
It is true that some physical conditions impair our ability to function as we were designed. Babies whose bodies don’t develop properly deserve the utmost compassion and attention. However, because his body isn’t functioning as it was intended, a person who was born blind, paralyzed, or in need of heart surgery is not a new species. Take it from none other than the Post’s “expert” Maurine Neiman, who refuted her own position without realizing it.
According to her article,” There are people who we could call females who don’t produce any eggs.” Well, yes, exactly — and we all recognize that those women are still women!
But wait, there’s more. The fact that Trump’s order” says sex is determined” at conception is defensible to The Post and its experts. ‘”  , But how could that be, says “expert” Eve Feinberg, because reproductive organs don’t form until later in gestation?
Oh my. What is ranked the No. 1 university for obstetrics and gynecology professor. 6 university in America. I wonder if she is aware that a baby’s genetic makeup is established when the sperm and the egg meet. Does she know that a baby’s skin color and eye color, for example, are determined genetically long before his skin and eyes fully develop?
I’d like to see more information provided to the Post and its experts on how the two types of anatomy complement one another in the creation of life, as well as all the other amazing, complementary differences between men and women. I’m really hoping someone will show them Webster’s definition of” sex,” which is beautiful in its political incorrectness in a way that historical texts can occasionally be.
It’s unfortunate for anyone to miss out on understanding that God’s design for both men and women is so wonderful. I hope some kind of mother or father sits down with The Washington Post staff members to listen to that discussion before consulting with any more “experts.”
Elle Purnell is the elections editor at The Federalist. Her work has been featured by Fox Business, RealClearPolitics, the Tampa Bay Times, and the Independent Women’s Forum. She received a B. A. in government from Patrick Henry College, with a journalism minor. Follow her on Twitter @_ellepurnell.
