Charlie Martin covered the announcement that Jeff Bezos “redirected” the Washington Post’s newspaper coverage to include “personal rights and completely areas” as its main force.
Advertisement
Under Biden, it appeared that the state had cut the buoy lines and stranded us rather than just that the United States had lost its ties. And the press was cheering it on instead of only supporting it, Charlie wrote.
Donald Trump’s victory altered that. Before the vote, Bezos began the transition to accept the new reality by allowing the Post to support a presidential member. Despite what the left was yelling about at the moment, the Post made a not-before-so-successful walk. The Post didn’t even begin supporting prospects until Jimmy Carter’s endorsement in 1976.
I wrote at the time of WaPo’s non-endorsement of Kamala Harris:
Two failing magazines were purchased out of vanity by Washington Post editor Jeff Bezos and Los Angeles Times editor Patrick Soon-Shiong. They expected to lose money. But the left-wing fruitcakes at both blogs think they are owed a career because they’re editors and the media is , important, and what we say things.  , They think they’re vital to the working of our state, and that “democracy may perish in darkness”. Without us, what will the country do?
I imagine blacksmiths, wheelwrights, and floor providers thought very much the same items.
Advertisement
” I am of America and for America, and glad to get so”, Bezos wrote to editorial page employees. ” Our land did not arrive by being usual,” the statement read. And independence everywhere has been a significant contributor to America’s success. Freedom is social — it minimizes force — and useful, it drives creativeness, invention, and prosperity”.
Real, true, and accurate. So why the violent backlash? Why did David Shipley, the director of the editorial page, retire? Why do other opinion site staff members threaten to keep?
Without any evidence, Shipley’s response is that he believes that the Post will no longer submit op-eds from rulers, terrorists, and other nasty creatures who want to spread the word about the United States.
In reply, Mr. Shipley expressed doubts about Mr. Bezos ‘ innovative method for a variety of factors, the people said. One of his reservations is that The Post’s episcopal approach to remark made the insurance unique and valuable, and it might be difficult to publish a regular section with high-quality writing on a smaller set of views.
“Ecumenical approach” to publishing is a euphemism for” controversy”. Journalists consider themselves significant and intriguing because of their questionable nature. They are invited on MSNBC because of it. It’s truly “unique”, but calling it “valuable” is another way of saying it sells documents.
Advertisement
Isn’t that kind of what Bezos was saying?
It doesn’t need to be a real danger to be seen as the end of the world, as with anything that disturbs the remaining nowadays.
Jeff Stein, the Post’s chief finance writer, called the shift a “massive incursion” on the mind website team and that “dissenting views will not be published or tolerated it”.
Huh? Where did Bezos’s speech say that?
” I still don’t feel any invasion on my media on the news part of the news, but I’ll get quitting right away and let you know if Bezos attempts to interfere with my journalism,” Stein wrote on X.
I hope he enjoys his game and departs.
Ok, there is a pattern emerging. It’s like the earth of a child’s hallucinations has become genuine, and the left is shadowboxing with demons, ghouls, and demons.  ,
There, that, my democratic friends. It’s just a wish. When you wake up, there will be no sun, no clouds, and no weather. Everything will be ideal.
Except Trump will still be leader.
