The conflict between Trump and Vance, on the one hand, and Zelenskyy, seems to be the main topic of discussion now.
On the one hand, the emotions to everything seem to fall under two categories: Zelenskyy’s comedy and Trump’s ignorance of geopolitics. Zelenskyy is a comedian.
Advertisement
No one seems to understand that Zelenskyy’s White House departure monday was the fruit of a dialogue that didn’t come to an end.
However, most people are firmly persuaded that it backs up their preconceived beliefs of Trump and Zelenskyy.  ,
The most interesting was, at least in my opinion, the person who said” that’s it, it’s over” and then repeated that phrase when I said it was premature,” but of course, it can always be restarted.”
I therefore have some ideas.
One. No one is familiar with nuthin’. We have no idea what was in Trump’s or Zelenskyy’s thoughts.
Two. For centuries, people have been calling Trump an idiot. This Trump type isn’t particularly predicted, in my opinion.  ,
Three. There are two keys to any kind of dialogue: both sides have their wants and both factors have terms that they can’t agree to.
Russians should cease blowing up their towns, as Ukraine absolutely wants. Trump wants to put an end to a battle that is a successful stalemate on conditions that are beneficial to the United States.
Advertisement
In today’s talk, Trump and Vance both knew that Zelenskyy wanted more US assistance, and Zelenskyy obviously assumed that the best way to gain more support was to bluster about the US never being kind enough.
Here’s the issue: Trump is a king negotiator who is aware of the need for you to be willing to reject a bargain.
Then, ignore people who claims to be completely knowledgeable about the events of yesterday and examine what took place.
Zelenskyy has then posted two posts in gratitude for everything the US has accomplished, which is essentially what Vance had mocked him for in the Oval Office. We also notice some indications that Zelenskyy was receiving advice from people from the prior management, such as Susan Rice, that he might be able to negotiate a better deal. Zelenskyy believed that this was because he believed he had make compromises out of Trump by embarrassing him in front of others.
Trump, on the other hand, evidently has his own, generally economic, objectives for a deal. He wants to end a never-ending conflict that is absorbing hundreds of billions of dollars, and forge a relationship that may stop the country’s long-term financial drain.  ,
Advertisement
Furthermore, he wants to see the EU advance in their own defense, which is, I believe, indirectly. I don’t believe there has been much hunger among the EU’s part state to actually do that. However, they have at least begun to voice their desire to actually improve defence spending.
The idea that all negotiations have ended is at the heart of the current discussion, because nothing could possibly change if it didn’t occur today. And that brings us to —
Four. Ukraine also requires US assistance. Trump also requires an acceptable settlement. And nothing has come to an end.
