The suggestion made by Vice President J. D. Vance that an American monetary presence would provide better protection for Russians than “peacekeeping” troops deployed across Europe offends the British media.
Vance and Sean Hannity spoke on Fox News ‘” Hannity” on the eve of the president’s speech to Congress about the significance of a minerals deal between Washington, D.C., and Kyiv. The agreement, which was scheduled to be signed on Friday, may have created a bank under the control of Americans that do receive money from Ukraine’s natural resources to aid in the country’s reconstruction. However, the contract was stifled by Volodymyr Zelensky’s angry White House meeting, which ended the deal. On Fox News on Monday, Vance rejected Zelensky’s plan to keep the conflict in the White House and on Fox News on Friday.
Hope is never a plan; instead, Vance said,” Waving money and weapons at a terrible fight is not a technique.” The President of the United States is the only one in area who can formulate a plan, and everyone should follow his example.
How many more lives are going to be lost, Hannity said, “is Zelensky, when he says it’s going to go on for decades, how many more lives are going to be lost? He won’t have a nation to preserve; the minerals deal would have enabled him to rebuild their nation, have a solid U.S. presence, and perhaps also send German troops.
The President is aware that the best safety assurance is to provide Americans financial benefit in the future of Ukraine, according to Vance.” The President knows that, look, if you want true security guarantees, if you want to ensure that Vladimir Putin does not attack Ukraine again,” Vance said. That is a far superior security promise to 20,000 troops from a arbitrary nation that hasn’t engaged in combat in 30 or 40 years.
Vance continued,” The goal of the safety assurance and the economic promise for Ukraine are to restore the nation and assure that America has a long-term attention.” If you attack the senator and refuse to follow his peace plan, you’re not going to do that.
After each country formally pledged “peacekeeping” soldiers to keep Ukraine pending a peace, the vice president’s remarks were characterized as a departure of France and the United Kingdom’s military efforts to U.S.-led activities in the Middle East.
A breaking reports article appeared in a London-based paper, The Times, stating that “UK defense assistance is from’some strange country that hasn’t fought a battle in 40 years.”
A former British Parliament part questioned in secret whether Donald Trump’s comments about the vice president were an” Russian property.” The Independent, Politico Europe, and the Daily Mail all reported on similar declarations of the vice president.
Another article appeared in the Irish Star titled “JD Vance slams UK as’some strange country’ after uncomfortable conversation with Prime Minister.”
Vance criticized the outcry as “absurdly unscrupulous.”
Vance wrote on X that” I don’t even explain France or the UK in the picture, both of whom have bravely fought alongside the US for the past 20 years and beyond.”
Let’s be clear, though, because there are many places that are volunteering ( privately or publicly ) but who lack the experience and military equipment to do anything meaningful, the vice president continued.
In fact, Politico reported on comments made by UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer on Sunday, saying that” a number of countries agreed to commit soldiers to a security power,” but adding that he would leave it up to individual nations to announce their contribution.
Since the evil president spoke to northern leaders at a security conference in Germany about alleged autocratic regimes, the Western media has been willing to demonize Vance.
At the Munich Security Conference, Vance stated that the Trump presidency is “very concerned with Western protection” and believes that a deal can be reached between Russia and Ukraine. The danger from within is the one that worries me the most about Europe.
Vance documented a number of instances in which Western leaders hailed the kind of repression and election interference that western democracies after detested.
The vice president reaffirmed that “we’ve been told for years that everyone we finance and support goes against our shared democratic values.” We should question whether we are holding ourselves to an appropriately higher standard when we see Western courts cancelling elections and top officials threatening to withdraw others when we see all from our Ukraine plan to digital censorship billed as a defense of democracy.
The speech was described as an “ideological war on Europe” and” a violent attack on European democracies,” according to a French newspaper called Le Monde last month.
