Democrats have evidently decided to just wail” No” in place of supporting policies that might actually benefit Americans! to everything that President Trump does, and wish that something will happen.
It’s obvious that it’s having an amazing result. And by “working,” I mean continuing to show how utterly unrelated they are to the world.
The White House responded by essentially telling him to examine himself after James Boasberg, a D.C. district judge appointed by Obama, decided it was time for a legal fight. Boasberg told the leadership he wasn’t sure he had the power to arrest alleged international gang members who were residing in the country. A one judge in one area can control the movement of an plane carrying foreign national terrorists who were actually kicked out of the United States, according to administration Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt.
We don’t actually understand how this will turn out as of Monday, but it raises the question: When may Democrats make a contribution that will be helpful? We just saw the crazy money debate that Democrats are nonetheless smarting over because some in their own group chose to ignore the president and grant them more money by doing it for the sake of it.
Rep. Nancy Pelosi opted to oppose the funding costs, calling it a “false option,” when what she meant to say was” a decision I didn’t like.” A fake choice is a natural mistake that offers more choices than what is presented. Democrats had just two choices: to support or reject the government’s establishment. Democrats may have found it difficult to get over the fact that either results would be beneficial for the White House– a shutdown would effectively provide Trump the authority to eliminate any governmental agencies he desired. But it’s not their fault but theirs.
They are the ones who make unnecessary drama out of every aspect of government business. And that’s only when they don’t make everyone confront the reality that legal orders from the judiciary only apply to the extent that they can be enforced. The District Court in Washington, D.C., has no army, according to what I’ve checked.
Is that something we need to revisit frequently? Although that’s going to take a very long four years, we can.
Or perhaps they should stop picking fights that they are unable to win or that require the nation to once more consider how fragile our nation is. It would be very simple to break. Democrats appear to be curious about what happens if it does.
