Former President Joe Biden boldly admitted to defying the Supreme Court numerous times while in office, and the internet hardly shuddered. However, the internet refers to it as a” legal problems” when President Donald Trump challenges a lower court ruling by an advocate prosecutor. The left-wing business media’s deliberate effort to spread the false narrative that Trump is an authoritarian danger is not sudden; instead, it is a part of the conspiracy theory.
Biden bragged about it while defying the Supreme Court’s 2023 decision on undergraduate loan.
” I promised to help millions of people who are students reduce their debts. The Supreme Court obstructed my case, but it didn’t prevent me,” Biden wrote on X.
” The Supreme Court attempted to stop me from paying off my student loan. But they continued to keep me.” Decades later, Binding doubled over. ” I’m going to keep going,” the statement read.
Biden admitted that he defied the Supreme Court. However, the propaganda push ‘ response was nothing more than a shrug.
Sareen Habeshian of Axios downplayed the Supreme Court’s decision as a mere” setback,” noting that Biden was able to provide “relief” by” circumventing the need for Congressional or court approval.”
According to Katie Lobosco of CNN, Biden “found methods” to keep postponing” student loan debt despite Supreme Court decisions.”
Although the Supreme Court rejected President Joe Biden’s signature student loan forgiveness program in late June [2023], Lobosco reported that his administration has since discovered ways to pay off more than$ 48 billion in debt.
Lobosco noted that Biden’s behavior” only two days after the Supreme Court rejected Biden’s signature loan forgiveness program” merely drew” some suspicion about whether” it was “legal” to announce that he was canceling additional debt.
Ron Lieber, a writer for The New York Times, wrote on July 10, 2023,” How Trump May Test to Cancel Student Debt Next,” noting that Biden may use the Higher Education Act of 1965.
President Biden stated on June 30 that he would attempt again after losing a Supreme Court case related to his$ 400 billion plan to stop student loan debt. But what precisely does he want to accomplish? Lieber wrote.
In October of this year, Zach Montague of The Times reported that Republican legal challenges have frequently hampered Biden’s” student debt agenda.” According to him, the Biden administration has been constantly thwarted in jury because” the Supreme Court and federal courts have determined that the Education Department’s use of various other means of improper erasing national student loan balances has been proven to have been excessive.”
In February of 2024, Zolan Kanno-Youngs wrote for The New York Times that “borrowers wondered how President Biden would fulfill his promise to address the loan burdening millions of Americans. The Supreme Court struck down President Biden’s program to withdraw billions of dollars in student loan debt.
Kanno-Youngs wrote,” The answer: He would do it bit by bit,” and later on how Biden “worked ] around the Supreme Court decision.”
The Washington Post article read,” Supreme Court’s end on student loan alleviation isn’t stop of Biden’s work,” and stated that Biden intended to “move back” with a “new program.”
However, the media’s strategy for defending Biden is a far cry from what they saw when Trump sued District Judge James Boasberg for challenging an attempt.
A group of illegal foreigners and alleged members of the Cuban group Tren de Aragua were deported under the 1789 Alien Enemies Act on a 14-day restraining order issued by Boasberg. On Sunday, a journey carrying lots of aggressive illegal aliens made its way to El Salvador.
White House Press Secretary The planes had now left and were in international waters, according to Karoline Leavitt in a statement released on Monday.
Leavitt claimed that” the Administration did not “refuse to comply” with a court order. After terrorist terrorist Torres de Aragua ] aliens had already been taken out of American territory, the order, which had no legal basis, was issued. The Administration’s behavior and the written order are unaffected.
A one judge in one city cannot control the movements of an aircraft carrying foreign-alien terrorists who were actually evacuated from American soil, she continued.
The advertising media has, however, collectively perpetuated the idea that a” constitutional crisis” is raging.
The article” Exclusive: How the White House ignored a judge’s order to turn back deportation flights” was published on Axios ‘ Marc Caputo on Sunday.
Caputo wrote that” the government’s decision to disregard a national judge’s order is extremely uncommon and highly contentious.”
According to Matthathias Schwartz of The New York Times, Trump “moved one significant move closer to a legal fight with the judicial branch of government.”
According to CNN’s Stephen Collinson, if the White House “violated a jury’s order,” it might take the nation closer to a” legal problems.”
“[I]f the administration defied the judge, it could lead to the most critical legal minefield of the administration’s solar system and would stoke fears that an authoritarian presidency might openly violate the rule of law,” Collinson wrote.
The Washington Post’s Aaron Blake attempted to refute the accusations because Biden, despite his own admission, didn’t truly challenge the Supreme Court.
Blake merely “pitched himself as circumventing” the Supreme Court, according to Blake, who claimed that” Biden did not challenge the Supreme Court.” Hence, Blake added, there is no “valid” comparison between Trump and Biden in this situation.
He is correct to say that they are not true.
The great judge informed Biden that his attempts to forgo student loans were against the law. An order issued by a second, low-level judge is being challenged by the Trump administration.
href=”https://www.cnn.com/2017/10/12/politics/donald-trump-autocrats-politics/index.html” target=”_blank” rel=”noreferrer noopener”>Trump‘s legal challenges being framed by the media as a” legal problems” is not just an reaction; it is a deliberate tactic to further the left-wing idea that he is an href=”https://www.cnn.com/2024/11/08/media/trump-authoritarian-press-media-attacks/index.html” target=”_blank” rel=”noreferrer noopener”>authoritarian, as Collinson suggested. The advertising media has href=”https://www.nytimes.com/2024/10/27/us/politics/trump-fascism.html” target=”_blank” rel=”noreferrer noopener”>feared that href=”https://www.cnn.com/2017/10/12/politics/donald-trump-autocrats-politics/index.html” target=”_blank” rel=”noreferrer noopener”>Trump is an href=”https://www.cnn.com/2024/11/08/media/trump-authoritarian-press-media-attacks/index.html” target=”_blank” rel=”noreferrer noopener”>authoritarian who needs to be stopped, actually after he won the election by a majority voting landslide in November of that year. The press helps to reinforce the notion that href=”https://www.cnn.com/2017/10/12/politics/donald-trump-autocrats-politics/index.html” target=”_blank” rel=”noreferrer noopener”>Trump threatens “democracy” by portraying him as a person who defies the rule of law while giving Biden a free pass for boldly abiding by the Supreme Court.
The Federalist’s election journalist, Brianna Lyman. With a diploma in International Political Economy, Brianna received her diploma from Fordham University. Her work has been published on RealClearPolitics, Fox News, Fox Business, and Newsmax. Following Brianna on X as @briannalyman2.
