Last year, Robin Shaber and her nephew, as well as at least 24 plastic containers of Coca-Cola and Mountain Dew, left the ShopRite in Cardiff in Harford County, Maryland.
Shaber, whose father drinks a lot of beer, said,” This is probably a few weeks ‘ worth.”
She discovered that soda prices keep rising even with a sale, with two packs for$ 12 and two more for$ 10. Shaber intends to cease purchasing drink at the ShopRite, simply feet from the Mason-Dixon range, and rather purchase it in Pennsylvania, where she lives, if Maryland begins to tax sugary drink distributors.
A contentious position bill that was created to address Maryland’s growing budget deficit is attracting the attention of shoppers, business owners, and professionals.
Advocates claim that a sweet beverage revenue will encourage the consumption of sweetened beverages and help to lock up a deficit and promote a healthier society. According to estimates for revenue, distributors of sugary beverages, powders, or syrups are expected to pay a 2-cent per-ounce excise tax in fiscal 2027, or$ 500 million.
However, critics claim that taxing the well-known drink will only harm families, employees, and small companies. The plan has been referred to as a” Mud Tax” by House Republicans.
The 18-year-old business manager at Brookville Market, a little food store in affluent Chevy Chase, claimed he didn’t believe for a tax would have an impact on sales.
According to Joe Wong,” If people want to buy a solution, no matter what the income is,” they won’t get less because of a 2-cent income.
under a expenses sponsored by Montgomery County, Delaware. Del. and Emily Shetty. A sweet tea is a tea made with artificial sweeteners or added sugars, according to Joseline Pea-Melnyk, who represents Prince George’s and Anne Arundel regions. Cheese, infant formula, drink for clinical usage, or alcoholic beverages are not included in this list.
Plans call for almost half of the tax revenue to be used to pay for scholarships for child care and healthy school lunches. The majority of the rest would go to the general portfolio of the state, but a new article could give a health equity portfolio about$ 15 million.
At a House Ways and Means Committee reading earlier this month, Shetty said,” This act is a public health costs. Other health issues include” It will reduce the consumption of sweetened beverages while investing in common school meals for children.”
Stephanie Joseph, a native of Silver Spring and a state staff, said she backs Shetty’s costs.
She said while shopping at Snider’s Super Foods in Silver Spring with her two children,” It’s a small budget, and it’s a healthy way to help Connotations.” ” I seldom buy beverages, generally only for events,” said one customer.
According to JP Krahel, a professor of finance at Loyola University’s Sellinger School of Business who specializes in taxes issues, the plan may be a means for the government to find a remedy through the issue itself. He contends that sweetened beverages will generate more revenue to help treat health issues brought on by their consumption.
A little duty placed on each of us might yield significant advantages, Krahel said. A qualified tax measure like this might aid Maryland’s multi-billion buck deficit be filled in a way that also encourages healthier beverage options but also gives consumers choice. There are worse way to close a budget gap than to reference everything to health issues.
No one likes higher taxes, but he added,” I don’t like the idea of falling ill from drinking too much sugar, and everyone has to pay the price for more ER visits,” he said.
However, Maryland residents who live close to stores in Pennsylvania, Delaware, and Virginia could find them there, hurting Maryland’s suppliers, according to Daraius Irani, general economist and vice president of strategic alliances and applied research at Towson University. He said that those who lack vehicles or reside in lower-income areas may bear more costs, have fewer choices, and have to pay more to acquire sweetened beverages.
Susquehanna Trails tenant of York County, Judy Lee, said she and her family frequently pick and choose between Maryland and Pennsylvania for various purchases. Vape shells cost less in Pennsylvania, she said, compared to the Maryland side, where gas is now less expensive. According to Lee, beer will be another factor that may influence Pennsylvania’s position.
She said,” I’m really tired of the way we’re being taxed every manner.”
Ron Hash, a native of Pennsylvania who often shops with his family at the Harford County ShopRite in Cardiff, agreed with him and said the government should do the same. He needs to keep his family subsistence living within its methods.
You don’t care when you’re in state, he said. They spend thousands and billion because they believe that taxes money is flowing in a similar manner to Niagara Falls and that it never stops.
It may be challenging to achieve state revenue goals if sales truly decline as a result of the tea tax, which is a good outcome if people switch beverage types to minimize the tax, Irani warned.
There are many moving parts, but Irani said that the sales number will never be the same as the sales number it was. When you open the door to this, do you go to other fees, and would they be at 2 cents or drop to 3 cents?” Another problem is…
A similar revenue in Philadelphia, according to Irani, caused some job losses and a decline in sweet beverage sales.
William Davis, president of Teamsters Local 639, the union representing hundreds of workers employed in manufacturing plants and distribution centers as vehicle drivers in the country’s beer and soft drink business, warned that this would also happen in Maryland.
In a letter to the House Ways & Means Committee chair on March 5, Davis wrote,” When prices go up, sales go down.” A decrease in sales would be caused by the men and women who produce, package, and deliver these products.
Two recent polls on the 2-cent tax revealed contradictory results. A majority of state voters, or 63 %, support the tax, according to a poll conducted by the American Heart Association. However, another survey conducted by David Binder Research shows that the majority of voters, or 56 %, oppose it. With the assistance of the American Beverage Association and in collaboration with the MD-DE-DC Beverage Association, that survey was conducted on behalf of the Alliance For an Affordable Maryland.
The best way to go is to impose taxes and raise prices on goods the government deems unhealthy, Lee Hartman, who was shopping at Safeway on Harpers Farm Road in Columbia last week, said. Parents should be able to choose whether or not to purchase sugary beverages for their children.
” I know little kids aren’t healthy for them, but I think parents can regulate that without paying a tax,” Hartman, a Columbia resident, said.
Wong, the Brookville Market grocery manager, claimed that when alcohol taxes became law in Maryland, they didn’t affect his customers ‘ buying habits.
He claimed that “people didn’t stop buying wine with that tax.” ” I saw no difference,” I said.
An added tax is” no biggie to me,” according to resident of Hampstead in Carroll County, who only purchases one liter of ginger ale between months.
David Olive, a resident of Washington who went shopping last week at Brookville Market, claimed he didn’t typically drink a lot of carbonated beverages and that he didn’t alter his habits after the state passed a beverage tax on sugary drinks. Maryland’s proposal is similar to Washington’s tax.
Luis Quintino, the manager of La Salvadorenita Grocery, had a different perspective a few miles away from Brookville in Silver Spring. If the legislation is passed, he does anticipate that sales will suffer.
” Actually right now, it’s really difficult because everything we buy will cost more and will increase,” Quintino said.
Because the prices have increased so much, he claimed, the store has already stopped buying Coca-Cola products.
” We currently buy more water,” we say.
___
© 2025 The Baltimore Sun.
Tribune Content Agency, LLC distributed.
