Kamala Harris Campaign Autopsy: ‘The More People Vote, the Better Republicans Do’

I’m never going to become a physician. No offence, but I don’t wanna be around most of y’all when you’re good and effectively. Being available at your beck and call when you’re tired, ugly, and hacked up mucus has NO charm.

However, I’d like to be an inquest dentist if I had to be one. Talk about a pressure-free work: What’s the worst that could happen? Never have to tell a lady who is grieving that you are sorry! Nobody cares about your bad bed habits! ( And best of all, who knows what goodies you might find in your “patient’s” pockets? )

A political autopsy has a disturbingly similar structure to a medical autopsy, with the postmortem graft: The company that performs the autopsy ( almost ) always demands more work from the client ( cha-ching! ). ), so a lot of its” opinions” will work well with the service it is attempting to sell.

And I’m not saying it’s doing anything irresponsible. That’s maybe the way it views the world. In any case, it’s likely that your autopsy will result in PR issues if you use a PR firm to execute it. If it specializes in community engagement, it’ll improve in on that. This is a crucial caveat to keep in mind because these “analytical, data-driven investigations” frequently exhibit less factual and creative prejudices, more so because they reflect the “physician” and “patient” prejudices more than the “patient” prejudices.

The Kamala Harris 2024 promotion examination was commissioned by Blue Rose Research, a pro-Democratic company. Obviously, they worked hard on it: They interviewed 26 million citizens, examined the poll information, and synthesized the benefits. ( Blue Rose Research collaborated with Kamala’s largest political action committee, Future Forward. ) &nbsp,

It’s a interesting postmortem — and it reveals options, risks, and responsibilities for both parties.

Second, it demonstrates how influential the mainstream media will always be: The Republicans didn’t succeed in 2024 because fewer people watched the internet and received better protection for our election campaigns! Acquire:

The most engaged people swung toward Democrats between 2020 and 2024, despite the fact that Democrats did worse nevertheless. &nbsp,

However, those who are least socially active wildly opposed Democrats. They’re a party that Biden both narrowly won or just lost four years ago. However, this time, they voted for Trump by triple digits.

And I believe that this is only crucial in terms of analysis. Individuals have a lot of concerns about how the mainstream media filled stuff. However, I believe it’s important to remember that the people who watch the information the most truly grew more Democrat. And the issue was essentially that a sizable subset of those who don’t even follow the news were becoming more traditional. [emphasis added]

Republicans now perform better when more people cast ballots, according to the next big getting. The key to a GOP triumph was a sad turnout from everyone else, and an excited base of republicans and moderates, according to the previous” regular wisdom.” Not so longer:

The reality is that Donald Trump would have won the popular vote by 5 items [rather than 1.7 points ] if all registered voters had turned out. Therefore, I believe a” we need to move up the heat and mobilize all” approach would have made things worse. [emphasis added]

Of course, that good ol’ fashioned Democrat pretentiousness is a difficult nut to crack. This was a strange boast, but it was also an interesting story:

One of my favorite numbers on this is something that Nate Cohn put out a few years ago: Working-class white citizens who’ve read a guide in the last year are much more Democrat than working-class white voters who haven’t. &nbsp,

The Democratic Party’s non-white journey is the second significant finding. MAGA’s 2024 return didn’t happen via juicing the participation among white electors but the large migration of immigrants from the Dems:

This is a clear example of white voters really hardly shifting if we examine trends from 2016 to 2024 in terms of race and ideology. In the eyes of white liberals, white liberals, and white reformers, Kamala Harris performed precisely as Hillary Clinton did. &nbsp,

However, these significant double-digit drops are evident in the voter data for Hispanic and Asian citizens. To give an illustration, Democrats received 81 percentage of Spanish reformers in 2016. Fast-forward to 2024, Democrats got only 57 percent of Hispanic reformers, which is really very similar to the 51 percent that Harris got among light reformers.

You’re aware that white people actually started to polarize a lot more toward ideology in the 1990s. Non-white citizens are starting to polarize their opinions on philosophy in the same way that white citizens did. &nbsp,

They didn’t jump almost as much when compared to African Americans. Before the Kamala switchover, Black voters were projected to turn 7 % to 8 % in favor of us in our polls. &nbsp,

I’m not sure if this will ever happen, but I’d suggest that getting 94 percent of any ethnic group is in the future. However, I believe that the voter losses that non-white people and immigrants are seeing are a sign of this wider, more philosophical fragmentation that Democrats are experiencing. [emphasis added]

Additionally, it raises questions about the Democratic Party’s method of putting so much emphasis on philosophy:

40 % of the population categorizes themselves as liberal in general. About 40 percent is average, 20 percent is progressive, though it depends precisely how you ask it. It’s occasionally 25 percent progressive. However, this is just another political trickle-down from Republicans, given how much Democrats attempt to polarize the public on self-described philosophy. [emphasis added]

Also, the Democrats are aware of their losing the vote from young men, but they still don’t know how to fix the issue:

If you consider voters under the age of 25, the sex gap has doubled in size. And if you look at 18-year-olds especially, 18-year-old men were 23 percentage points more likely to voting for Donald Trump than 18-year-old people. Additionally, it appears that sex magnetization is growing in different nations as well. The way it operates vary from one state to the next. In Germany, for example, young ladies voted in extremely large amounts for Die Linke, the left-wing group it.

There are many different items that could be causing this. However, I believe that if you look at non-political voting, you can actually see proof that there is crazy, cultural shift taking place around and essentially everywhere else in the virtual world. In Norway, there’s a ballot of high school students where the proportion of young people saying, “gender justice has gone to way” spiked in recent years. &nbsp,

I have no idea what the solution to that is necessarily. [emphasis added]

The Trump administration needs to take note that” cost of living issues” will determine whether or not MAGA will succeed. Although things like DOGE, Gaza, Ukraine, Greenland, Canada, and the rest are important on the outside, politics dictates that the “main thing” be kept the same.

In 2020, what people cared about the most was Covid and health care. And those were the issues on which people had the greatest faith. So we simply had to talk about Covid and health care, which was a simple task. That’s what we did. And we prevailed. &nbsp,

But the situation this time was a lot harder. The cost of living was overwhelmingly the issue that voters were most concerned with. I can’t really put a price on how much people thought about the cost of living. If you ask what’s more important, the cost of living or some other issue picked at random, people picked the cost of living 91 percent of the time. It’s really difficult to get 91 percent of survey respondents to click anything.

After the cost of living, the federal government’s size and scope, the budget deficit, immigration, crime, and also healthcare. And people trusted Republicans on these issues by double-digits— except for health care, where we had a 2-point advantage, which was much lower than our traditional advantage on that issue. [emphasis added]

Blue Rose Research advises focusing on Elon Musk, the economy, and “oligarch-bashing” as to how the Democrats will attack Trump.

Trump’s approval rating has dropped since he took office. His ratings for handling the economy, which he has historically been admired, have decreased significantly, and his living expenses have also decreased. Elon Musk is also becoming much more unpopular, making him the most unpopular member of his administration overall. Trump and Elon have really spent the first part of their term diving into the biggest weaknesses of the Republican Party — namely, they’re trying to pass tax cuts for billionaires, they’re cutting essential services and causing chaos for regular people left and right, while trying to slash social safety net programs. It’s Paul Ryan-ism on steroids.

In terms of vigorously opposing these highly unpopular economic changes that Trump is pushing through, I believe we have a real chance to go back to the politics of 2012. [emphasis added]

One Last Thought: The Democrats are in trouble, but bear with me, the donkeys are still dangerous. 2025 will either be remembered as the year that made America great again, or as the year that everything fell through our fingers. We need your help to succeed! As a VIP member, you’ll have access to all of our family of websites ( PJ Media, Townhall, RedState, Twitchy, Hot Air, Bearing Arms ): more stories, more videos, more content, more fun, more conservatism, more EVERYTHING! Additionally, if you CLICK HERE and use the promo code FIGHT, you’ll receive a Trumpian 60 % discount! &nbsp,

Thank you so much for your time.

Source credit