Folks, the” Snow White” remake is finally here, folks! What we’ve all been begging for since 1937! You can reduce the pleasure in the air with a razor because it is so thick! I’ll have to Foundation jump off a skyscraper to reduce my adrenaline enough to watch the movie without falling out!
Advertisement
Sorry, had to get that outta my program. I feel stronger right now.
Honestly speaking, the trailers aren’t short enough to conceal the fact that this film is going to be positively awful, and that’s before the politicians are added in. The film looks like a damaged swirl of computer-generated chaos, the trustworthiness of which doesn’t include passed muster for” Howard the Duck”.
And that’s after Disney had to redo significant portions of the film, which had a resources of$ 240 million to$ 290.4 million. You may wonder why. Because direct actress Rachel Zegler shot her company in the legs with a$ 29.4 million shot by going whole woke in numerous interviews before the film’s release.
When she decried the first Snow White movie as a “love tale where the man actually stalks her,” she plunged her initial knife into Caesar Iger’s back last year. Weird. Zegler continued,” She’s not going to be saved by the duke and she’s not going to be dreaming about real passion. She has a dream in which to lead her as she knows she may be. Snore. Wake me up when she’s off her pulpit.
Zegler did what sheltered activist drama assholes do best: obscure and divert following the common reaction. In her situation, she concealed her gender and deflected ( “my mere existence has provided an education to those who don’t have a basic sense of empathy” ) while avoiding reality.
Usually bad and never in doubt, she finally displayed her personal empathy by describing Trump’s reelection as “another four years of hatred”, indicative of a nation that harbors a “deep, strong sickness” and said that she hopes Trump and all his supporters not know peace. She even made comments about “free Palestine.” I’d like to observe her locate it on a chart.
Advertisement
Lay down and have another Tide Pod, Rachel. You’re not being” torn over” for being a lady, and your “mere life” isn’t a gauge for other people’s compassion. You are being criticized for continuously making pointless remarks about subjects you can’t comprehend. Either walk by your opinions or don’t, but halt pretending you’re the target these. People with far less energy, wealth, status, and influence than you do have the opportunity to make their voices heard, and free speech does both. If you can’t hear us, the box company can.
But even before Zegler, professional Peter Dinklage threw a common hissy meet at the idea of seven dwarfs being in the copy. I’m sorry, but I’m not kidding when I say that he criticized the remake for having a “problematic picture of dwarves” and doing “nothing to advance the cause” of the dwarf area. Disney then clung to the woke as merely Disney you. The gnomes were replaced with seven “magical species” who looked like they’d been turned away at the gate of a shaggy protocol for dressing to outrageously.
As you may recall, Dinklage saw his profession explode after being cast in the HBO series Game of Thrones as Tyrion. He appeared to play the part of the mocked, detested, and betrayed midget son of an intolerant imperial family without a doubt. Nor did he demand that HBO cut his position and replace it with a “magical thing” whose position doesn’t image dwarfs. Funny how certain activists ‘ values take a back seat when those values would prevent them from making millions.
Advertisement
However, Disney decided to return the “magical creatures” to the gimmick box and use seven CGI dwarfs after spending untold amounts of money filming them due to the foreseeable public backlash. So, Disney is once again using dwarfs, which will infuriate Peter Dinklage, but Disney won’t even use real dwarfs, which will rightly infuriate dwarfs in the acting business who got passed up for the gig. And the CGI dwarfs come across as neither endearing nor likeable, but rather somewhere between unfunny, clumsy, and noise-in-the-closet nightmare.
Fans have seen enough of the film before it even comes out, already sick of the woke force-feeding they regularly receive from Hollywood. Once marketing costs are accounted for, the film would need to gross roughly$ 625 million to break even. The most optimistic projections don’t indicate that it will surpass$ 500 million.
Would Disney’s CEO make any changes if he had been a corporate spy with the authority to make the worst decisions that could possibly endanger the business and its reputation?
Disney has been criticized for being anti-male, but I disagree. Despite surface appearances that the contrary, their recent films have been definately anti-female. Please allow me to explain:
The Disney films I grew up with had a very necessary, very humbling, and, yes, very empowering message for boys. Following a path of lies, hedonism, and mindless impulsive pleasure,” Pinocchio”  , taught me that nothing but brute labor would make me a braying ass. There is nothing “patriarchal” or “matriarchal” about wanting to be actively involved in your children’s education, and Mary Poppins taught me that family is more important than career. ” The Lion King” taught me that if I wanted to be treated like a man, it was time to grow up and accept the responsibility of being a man rather than hanging out with my slothful, immature friends all day long.
Advertisement
It’s not always about me, what I want, or what makes me feel good, the message I received as a boy was clear. It’s about the people who live there and, most importantly, my family, and how my choices affect others. It’s about what’s expected of me— as a real boy, as a father, as a leader — in order to overcome adversity and strengthen myself to be a man worthy of the society and culture with which I’ve been gifted.
The message certainly did not convey to me that I was flawless and that the world should see my way and appreciate how wonderful I consider myself to be.
Related: Adult Responsibilities Require Adult Rights
On the contrary, recent Disney films seem to be telling girls the exact opposite: There’s nothing wrong with you, there’s nothing you need to work on, and if you’re unhappy with your lot in life, it’s certainly not your fault. Instead, the culprit is most likely a corrupt father, a dishonest suitor, or a rebellious society full of provincial jeremes who simply don’t “understand” you.  ,
And the idea of a modern Disney princess falling in love with a competent, handsome, responsible prince? She might as well dress up as a” Handmaid’s Tale” cosplayer and join the group of willing slaves, pfft.
Disney instructs boys to act and behave their age, grow up in the hell, and remember that no one is ever going to forgive them, and that their own actions and successes will be directly correlated with their success and failures. The girls and women in boys ‘ lives are not only good, but they’re indispensable in helping boys achieve their potential.
Advertisement
Disney teaches girls that no matter how imperfect they are, and that any unhappiness they experience is the direct result of other people living in their lives who are either secretly working to oppress them. The Gen Z Disney princesses ‘ eventual happiness comes not from their growing and developing as individuals, but rather from the rest of the world learning to appreciate them.
The Beast from” Beauty and the Beast” teaches boys that wealth and power are no excuse for arrogance and indifference, and that a man’s ugliness is in inverse proportion to his love and empathy. The Beast has flaws, and he needs to work on improving himself for the betterment of the world around him.
Even though they are beautiful, well-liked, and gifted with miraculous abilities, girls can still somehow weave the narrative into their own narratives as victims, as Isabela from” Encanto” teaches them. Isabela is perfect, and it’s everyone around her (especially Abuela, the dreaded old generation ) who is flawed with their unfair expectations of her.
The Blue Fairy instructs boys to be “brave, true, and unselfish” in” Pinocchio.” No right, no wrong, and no rules for me, Queen Elsa of” Frozen” tells girls. Disney uses animated fantasy to teach boys about the real world. Disney deceives girls into believing that they are real people because of their animated waking up.
So who does Disney actually favor? Who is Disney hurting by setting up an unrealistic sense of self and of how life functions?
Advertisement
The unfortunate Zegler and her Disney partners illustrate the progressive mindset that pits groups against one another in a zero-sum game where one cannot succeed without the other being oppressed.
And as for Dinklage, keep working, buddy. Maybe you’ll get your way, and dwarfs in film will go the way of Uncle Ben, Aunt Jemima, and the Land O ‘ Lakes Indian.
In conclusion, the disastrous slow-motion train wreck from” Snow White’s” two-year release deserves all the slack and more attention that has been casted upon it. I don’t care how much the film has been “fixed” by repeated reshoots. The entire exercise has been a textbook example of how to drive away legions of loyal fans through corporate, self-absorbed virtue signaling.
Don’t stop at Disney. Don’t bear the pressure. Don’t go see” Snow White”, and tell everybody you know to do the same. The more likely it is that they will eventually grow from their mistakes, the harder it bombs.
That$ 625 million is OUR money, Disney needs to make it all the way up. They need US to give it to THEM. Our only veto power over Disney producing more garbage like this is through our money. Make it cost them millions of dollars each time the Zeglers and Dinklages of the industry open their maws to tarnish us with our deplorable beliefs.
Advertisement
Boycott this movie, and whatever woke drivel they shovel our way. Don’t give your money to those who despise you.