
Hillary Clinton was correct, because odd as it may sound. The then-first woman testified before Congress in 1993 about the heath care package that her work force had created, stating that it was about providing benefits to immigrants:
We do not believe that those who work without a legal document and are illegal aliens should receive detailed health care benefits. We do not want to do something to promote more improper immigration into this nation. As it stands, we now know that there are too many people seeking medical treatment. We definitely don’t want them to enjoy the same advantages that Americans are entitled to.
California, one of the blue states that just expanded government-funded health care to people living in improperly, recently discovered the truth of Clinton’s words from more than 30 years ago.
Newsom’s multibillion-dollar loan
California’s Democratic Governor late. The status would need to lend$ 3.44 billion, the maximum amount permitted by law, to flood the Medicaid program over until the end of March, according to Gavin Newsom’s informed the government. Days later, Newsom claimed he would need to attack the state’s public fund by an additional$ 2.8 billion to make up for the Medicaid deficit between now and the end of the fiscal year in California. Just to keep the system going until the end of June, that’s a complete of$ 6.2 billion in Medicaid loans.
According to Newsom’s business, the increase in Medicaid costs is more related to general trends across the country than just the immigrant system. ( States can fund these populations with state funds, but they do not receive federal Medicaid matching funds to pay for their own illegal immigrants, aside from for emergency care. ) These assertions are insufficiently robust on numerous rates.
First of all, a thinly veiled fraud to expand the welfare state in California contributed to the problems that caused the Medicaid shortfalls, such as difficulty organizing cash flow “because of changes a duty on specific health care plans” and a large portion of the increased membership by elders. The state developed a” creative” and probably illegal financing strategy that was primarily intended to bribe the federal government with more coordinating funds, as others have already pointed out. The government used those funds to ( indirectly ) fund the coverage of illegal immigrants and to remove the Medicaid asset tests, which allow seniors with significant financial assets to receive care on the taxpayer’s dime.
Nearly half of the$ 6.2 billion Medicaid shortfall is attributed to the coverage of migrants, or$ 2.7 billion. More to the point: If California did not offer coverage for people who are illegally present in this country, its Medicaid gap would not exist at all, with the migrant protection currently costing a total of$ 8.4 billion. Which raises two clear issues: Why did California spend$ 8.4 billion this fiscal year and an estimated$ 7.4 billion the following to promote illegal immigration? And does costs actually decrease as California suggests?
Need for Fair-Sighting Regulations
Illinois, another deep-blue state, has reportedly veered in the same manner. Democrat Governor’s cost is rising as a result of the rising costs for its own immigrant protection program. J. About 6, 000 people may become ineligible for the software as a result of B. Pritzker froze some new enrollees for taxpayer-funded treatment in 2023, has instituted copayment needs, is implementing registration redeterminations beginning April 1, and does change eligibility criteria for some “documented” immigrants. Pritzker effectively shifts costs for some immigrants from Illinois to federal taxpayers by making them ineligible for state-run Medicaid ( Legally present immigrants can qualify for federally funded Exchange subsidies ).
The lesson seems obvious: Providing those who are illegally present with “free” taxpayer-funded benefits causes skyrocketing costs for states, as well as worsening border stress. States would be much better off not going this route in the first place, instead of having a financial mess on their hands.