Governor refutes choice, court laws, and government laws, bans First Amendment privileges.
Drag show restrictions was recently overturned by a federal jury, which ruled it violated First Amendment rights.
In response, the Queer Empowerment Council is now permitted to host its annual” Draggieland” show on March 27, which was against the law, according to a news release from the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression.
Following the ban, FIRE filed a complaint on behalf of the QEC, a student-run firm at Texas A& M. Additionally, the free speech advocacy group requested an injunction to permit QEC to host its annual” Draggieland” show.
The Board members directly reject the First Amendment’s prohibition against viewpoint discrimination, targeting speech because it is perceived as ideological, according to FIRE’s lawsuit.
In Judge Lee Rosenthal’s decision, QEC makes reference to the drag ban’s claim that it constitutes “quintessential” stance bias, which” creates the notion that the ban is illegal regardless of the type of forum.”
However, the Texas A&M System Board of Regents argued that the university has more discretion over how much speech is censored in that space because Rudder Theatre is a “limited open forum” rather than a “designated people forum.”
According to Rosenthal, the provincial court’s investigation centered on whether Draggieland is a First Amendment protected speech or expressive conduct.
According to her,” Draggieland’s performance and speeches are intended to convey a message about LGBTQ+ right that is both historically significant.”
Draggieland is deemed to be protected by the court’s ruling regarding talk and expressive behavior, she wrote.
The Texas A&, M System Board of Regents unanimously approved the ban on pull displays at its 11 colleges last month, citing “disrespect for girls and a hostile culture,” according to The College Fix.
When do shows where people dress as ladies cross the line between being interesting and insulting? Rosenthal wrote.
The difficulty of answering that question honestly demonstrates why such standards cannot serve as the justification for a ban on expressive behavior, she wrote.
According to FIRE, the decision was” a rousing success for the First Amendment at public colleges in Texas.”
The court affirmed that state school officials can’t censor student expression that they deem offensive. He argued that state officials should cease attempting to win individuals ‘ First Amendment rights in exchange for political gain.
However, Texas Governor Greg Abbott disagreed with the decision, stating in a blog on X that “drag displays are not welcome at Texas institutions.”
” Texas colleges have every right to set the schedule for events on their colleges.” Drag shows market a dramatic gender ideology, he wrote.” Our universities must educate our students; NOT to indoctrinate them,” he wrote.
Further: SCOTUS rejects an urgent request for a drag show on campus
Drag monarch on silver ornaments history, Stefano Oppo/Canva Pro, IMAGE CAPTION AND CREDIT
Follow The College Fix on Twitter and Like us on Twitter.
